Securities Lawyers Blog
According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Mark Grober (Grober), previously associated with Dreyfus Service Corporation, has at least one disclosable event. These events include one regulatory event, alleging that Grober recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a final customer complaint on August 19, 2024.
The Securities and Exchange Commission deems it appropriate that cease-and-desist proceedings be, and hereby are, instituted pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) against GHS Investments, LLC (GHS), Mark S. Grober, Sarfraz S. Hajee, and Matthew L. Schissler (collectively, Respondents). In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondents have submitted Offers of Settlement which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of these proceedings, which are admitted, and except as provided herein, Respondents consent to the entry of this Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order (‘Order’). The commission finds that this matter involves violations of the Exchange Act’s broker-dealer registration provisions by GHS. From 2017 through 2022 (the relevant period), GHS operated as an unregistered securities dealer and sold billions of shares of stock from at least 23 issuers into the public market and generated millions of dollars in profits for its own account. During the relevant period, GHS engaged in the regular business of acquiring convertible, variable rate notes from penny stock securities issuers, converting the notes into stock at a substantial discount from the prevailing market price, and selling the resulting newly issued shares of the issuers’ stock into the public market to obtain profits from the difference between the discounted share price it received and the prevailing market price of the stock. Because GHS was not registered with the Commission as a securities dealer, GHS avoided certain regulatory obligations that govern the conduct of dealers in the marketplace, including the requirements to follow financial responsibility rules and maintain certain books and records. Grober, Hajee, and Schissler managed the day-to-day operations of GHS and shared the decision-making authority over GHS’s acquisition and disposition of convertible notes during the relevant period. As a result, GHS violated and Grober, Hajee, and Schissler caused GHS’s violations of Section 15(a)(1) of the Exchange Act.
Brokers are required to adhere to the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) standard of care under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which establishes a ‘best interest’ standard for broker-dealers and associated persons. This standard applies when a registered representative is providing investment advice through making recommendations customers and covers securities transaction, investment strategies, and recommendations concerning advice on opening of an account or accounts. Reg BI is drawn from fiduciary principles that include an obligation to act in the retail investor’s best interest and the broker is prohibited from placing their own interests ahead of the investor’s interest.
There are several different aspects of the rule that brokers must comply with. One of which is the care obligations which requires brokers to form a reasonable belief that their investment advice and recommendations are in the retail investor’s best interest. The care obligations includes three components. First, the advisor must have an understanding of the potential risks, rewards, and costs associated with a product, investment strategy, account type, or series of transactions. Next, the advisor must have a reasonable understanding of the specific retail investor’s investment profile. The customer’s profile information generally includes an investor’s financial situation and needs; investments; assets and debts; marital status; tax status; age; investment time horizon; liquidity needs; risk tolerance; investment experience; investment objectives and financial goals; and any other information the retail investor may disclose in connection with the recommendation or advice. Finally, the advisor must use their knowledge of the first two elements to consider reasonably available investment option alternatives and come to the conclusion that there is a reasonable basis to believe that the recommendation or advice being provided is in the retail investor’s best interest.
An advisor must understand the type of account, securities, and their client in order to meet their care obligations. The type of securities account has the potential to greatly affect retail customers’ costs and investment returns. Different types of securities accounts can offer different features, products, or services, and not all types of accounts or services would be in every investor’s best interest.
Grober has been in the securities industry for more than 1 year. Grober has been registered as a Broker with Dreyfus Service Corporation since 2007.
Investors who have suffered losses are encouraged to contact us at (800) 810-4262 for consultation. At Gana Weinstein LLP, our attorneys are experienced representing investors who have suffered securities losses due to the mishandling of their accounts. Claims may be brought in securities arbitration before FINRA. Our consultations are free of charge and the firm is only compensated if you recover.
