Selling Away

James Neilsen and Catherine Sheridan Accused of Being Involved Ulysses Partners Unregistered Securities

May 11, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The attorneys of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating a series of actions by the Connecticut Department of Banking (the Commissioner) involving James Neilsen (Neilsen), Neilsen Financial Services (NFS), Ulysses Partners, LLC (Ulysses), and Catherine Sheridan (Sheridan) and allegations that Neilsen sold over $10,000,000 in unregistered securities offerings to customers. The actions are Docket No. CRF-13-8014-S and CRF-15-8175-S. The Commissioner alleged that from approximately November 2005 through approximately December 2010, Neilsen offered and sold approximately $10 million of securities to at least ten Connecticut investors who were mostly his CPA clients. These funds were allegedly used primarily to finance Ulysses’ business expenses.

Neilsen was previously registered as a broker-dealer agent of Tradition Asiel Securities Inc. (Tradition Asiel) from December 17, 2004 to July 2, 2007, and with Sound Securities, LLC (Sound Securities) from August 7, 2008 to December 9, 2009. Neilsen was also registered with the National Futures Association (NFA) as an associated person of Longship Alternative Asset Management (Longship) from April 5, 2010 to December 29, 2010. In addition, Neilsen has been a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) with the Connecticut State Board of Accountancy since October 9, 1986. Neilsen was a founding member, chief financial officer, and treasurer of Ulysses and handled all of Ulysses’ day-to day financial decisions. Ulysses is now a defunct Illinois limited liability company but was a third-party marketer of hedge funds whose main function was to introduce and market hedge funds to financial institutions in exchange for the hedge funds paying Ulysses a fee.

According to the Commissioner Neilsen along with three other parties formed Ulysses as a self-described “third-party marketer” to solicit and refer prospective institutional investors to hedge funds. Two of those parties resigned from Ulysses within several months of Ulysses’ inception and were never actively involved in Ulysses’ activities. The third party, Sheridan was alleged to be a founding member, chief executive officer, and control person of Ulysses until she resigned from Ulysses in 2010. The Commissioner claimed that Sheridan handled all of the marketing and networking functions at Ulysses. The Commissioner found that Sheridan and Neilsen split revenues generated by Ulysses equally. In addition, Sheridan was previously registered as a broker-dealer with Tradition Asiel from August 10, 2004 to July 2, 2007, and with Sound Securities from July 25, 2007, to October 7, 2010. Sheridan is currently registered with FINRA as a general securities representative, general securities principal, options principal and equity trader with the brokerage firm North South Capital, LLC (North South). Sheridan is also currently registered with PE Investments LLC, a commodity pool operator associated with the NFA.

Paul Godlewski Formerly of Allstate Financial Barred Over Outside Business Activities Investigation

May 5, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently sanctioned and barred broker Paul Godlewski (Godlewski) concerning allegations Godlewski refused cooperate with requests made by FINRA in connection with an investigation into possible outside business activities. Such activities may, under certain circumstances also involve investment transactions referred to as “selling away” in the industry. According to FINRA BrokerCheck records Godlewski has disclosed outside business activities include Preferred Systems, Inc., PA Tags & Notary, and certain rental property real estate interests. It is unclear whether FINRA’s investigation concerns these particular outside business activities.

Godlewski entered the securities industry in 2004, when he became associated with Allstate Financial Services, LLC (Allstate). Godlewski held a Series 6 license which is for an Investment Company and Variable Contracts Products Representative. On January 12, 2015, Allstate filed a termination notice (known as a Form U5) with FINRA disclosing that Godlewski was discharged from the firm.

According to FINRA, in March 2015, the agency began investigating whether Godlewski had engaged in outside business activities and failure to follow Allstate’s procedures concerning televised public appearances. As part of its investigation, on March 12, 2015, FINRA sent a request to Godlewski for certain documents and information. According to FINRA, Godlewski stated on a call with FINRA staff on March 16, 2015, that he will not cooperate with the investigation. Consequently, Godlewski was barred by FINRA.

Former MetLife and Pruco Securities Advisor Bryan Anderson Charged With Ponzi Scheme

April 10, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to news sources Bryan Anderson (Anderson) has been charged with wire fraud, money laundering and securities fraud, according to the FBI and the Alabama Securities Commission Anderson agreed to plead guilty to the charges under a plea agreement. Under the plea agreement Anderson will pay restitution of about $3.1 million to the victims of his Ponzi scheme.

According to the allegations, between January 2009 and January 2014, Anderson’s false investment promises caused 18 individuals to deliver more than $8.4 million to Anderson, which he deposited into an account held at BancorpSouth. When the scheme collapsed in May 2014, about 12 investors lost about $3.1 million.

It is alleged that Anderson solicited investors to invest in stock options that he said employed various trading strategies. However, the stock options he described were not registered securities. Anderson also offered investments in a company he owned called 360 Properties. Beginning in or about 2009, Anderson falsely represented to investors in 360 Properties that their returns would come from leased property income, when in fact there were no leased properties.

FINRA Bars Broker David Blasik Concerning Allegations of Outside Business Activities

March 4, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned and barred broker David Blasik (Blasik) concerning allegations that Blasik engage in outside business activities. When the outside business activity also includes the recommendation of investments the activity is referred to in the industry as “selling away.”

FINRA Rule 8210 authorizes the regulator to require persons associated with a FINRA member to provide information with respect to any matter involved in the investigation. In December 2014, FINRA alleged that it pursued an investigation into allegations that Blasik engaged in undisclosed outside business activities. FINRA requested that Blasik provide documents and information to the agency. On December 30, 2014, FINRA stated that Blasik emailed the regulator and stated that he would not provide information or cooperate in the investigation.

According to Blasik’s brokercheck he has disclosed outside business activities including his tax preparation company. Blasik’s disclosures also reveal that he has been employed or involved with Commercial Metal Fabricators, Gateway Sports MGM, and DMH of Ohio, Inc. It is unclear at this time what organization Blasik was involved with that FINRA was investigating.

FINRA Sanctions Former Ameriprise Broker Radcliffe Daly Over Sloud Recommendations

February 18, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently sanctioned former Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. (Ameriprise) broker Radcliffe Daly (Daly) concerning allegations that between May 2013 and November 2013, while Daly was registered with Ameriprise, Daly mismarked more than 250 order tickets for solicited transactions as unsolicited. In addition, FINRA alleged that during the same period Daly engaged in private securities transactions (also known as “selling away”) without providing written notice to Ameriprise. FINRA also alleged that Daly exercised unauthorized discretion in customer accounts.

Daly entered the securities industry in 2003 and left the industry in June 2014. During the majority of this time Daly was associated with Ameriprise until January 2014.

FINRA alleged that Daly recommended a penny stock, Sloud, Inc. (SLOU), to numerous customers during 2013. According to FINRA Daly placed 292 buy transactions for 43 different customers in the Sloud stock between May 3 and November 7, 2013. However, instead of properly marking the transactions as solicited, Daly allegedly falsely marked 253 of these purchases as unsolicited. FINRA also found that Daly continued to solicit purchases of Sloud and to inappropriately mark the trades as unsolicited even after being told by his firm in June 2013 that he could not solicit purchases of the stock because it was a penny stock and not supported by firm research. From the allegations made by FINRA it appears that Daly attempted to circumvent Ameriprise’s instructions by mismarking the tickets as unsolicited.

FINRA Bars Former Pruco Securities and MetLife Securities Broker Derek Weaver

January 14, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently barred broker Derek Weaver (Weaver) alleging that Weaver failed to provide documents and information to FINRA in response to demands made to investigate the broker’s activities. On December 1, 2014, FINRA sent Weaver a request for documents concerning allegations that he participated in a Ponzi scheme. The details concerning the exact nature of the alleged Ponzi scheme and Weaver’s role are not yet fully known.

The allegations against Weaver are consistent with a potential “selling away” securities violation. In the industry the term selling away refers to when a financial advisor solicits investments in companies, promissory notes, or other securities that are not pre-approved by the broker’s affiliated firm. Under the FINRA rules, a brokerage firm owes a duty to properly monitor and supervise its employees in order to detect and prevent brokers from offering such products. In order to properly supervise their brokers each firm is required to establish and maintain written supervisory procedures and implement such policies in order to monitor the activities of each registered representative. Selling away often occurs in environments where the brokerage firms either fails to put in place a reasonable supervisory system or fails to actually implement that system and meet supervisory requirements.

In selling away cases, investors are unaware that the advisor’s investments are either not registered or not real. Typically investors will not learn that the broker’s activities were wrongful until after the investment scheme is publicized or the broker simply shuts down shop and stops returning client calls.

Ameritas Broker Jason Muskey Accused of Stealing Customer Funds

December 31, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently barred broker Jason Muskey for failing to respond to the regulator’s requests for information. FINRA’s investigation appears to have been prompted by Muskey’s termination from Ameritas Investment Corp. (Ameritas) after the firm alleged that he failed to respond to the firm’s request for information concerning an internal investigation concerning theft and forgery. Muskey was registered with Ameritas from June 2006, through June 2014. Muskey operated his business through Ameritas, upon information and belief, through a DBA called Muskey Financial Services.

Since the termination eight customers have filed customer complaints against Ameritas accusing the firm of failing to supervise Muskey’s activities and alleging that Muskey engaged in a Ponzi scheme that led to the theft of their funds.

As recently reported in the times-tribune Muskey was sued recently by his own mother, his wife’s uncle, an aunt, and two others alleging that he stole almost $400,000 in the scheme. Muskey allegedly used the money for his personal benefit and covered up the thefts for years by sending out fake quarterly financial statements that listed a set of phony investments. Many of Muskey’s victims are hard-working blue collar workers who had placed their money with Muskey for retirement.

Ismail Elmas Admits to Stealing Over $1 Million From Investors

November 3, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

As we reported earlier, broker Ismail Elmas’ (Elmas) Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) BrokerCheck records show that the representative was recently discharged from CUSO Financial Services, LP (CUSO Financial) concerning allegations that the broker “converted client funds for personal use as well as participated in an unauthorized outside business activity involving investments without the firm approval…”

Thereafter, investors have come forward to complain that Elmas allegedly engaged in unauthorized activity and other wrongful acts. Then in late October, Elmas pleaded guilty in federal court in Alexandria, to a count of wire fraud. Elmas admitted that he bilked at least 10 investors out of $1 million to $7 million dollars. According to news sources, Assistant U.S. Attorney Chad Golder said in court that Elmas, whose d/b/a business Apple Financial Services, an affiliate of Apple Federal Credit Union, preyed upon elderly and widowed investors and used a variety of methods to hide stolen funds. One of the more salient aspects of Elmas’ fraud is that unlike many schemers, Elmas was not promising large or sky-high returns or pushing clients into complicated financial products.

Our firm represents investors who are the victims of schemes, like Elmas’, to hold the brokerage firm responsible. The brokerage firms that employ Elmas are responsible for supervising his conduct. Elmas’ scheme presents a classic “selling away” securities violation scenario. In selling away cases, a financial advisor solicits investments in companies, promissory notes, or private placements that were not approved by the broker’s affiliated firm. In order to properly supervise their brokers each firm is required to establish and maintain a system to supervise the activities of each registered representative. When selling away activity occurs, it is often because the supervisory environment is deficient because the brokerage firm either fails to put in place a reasonable supervisory system or fails to actually implement that system and meet supervisory requirements.

FINRA Files Complaint Against Toni Chen Over Failure to Respond to Inquiries Relating to a Pyramid Scheme

October 27, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) brought a complaint against broker Toni Chen (Chen) concerning allegations that during the course of FINRA’s investigation into whether Chen was involved in a pyramid scheme that may also constitute “selling away” activities. Chen failed to respond to FINRA’s requests.

On October 18, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a Form U6 with FINRA regarding Chen’s activities disclosing the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York had granted the SEC’s request for a temporary restraining order for an asset freeze and other emergency relief against Chen and other defendants. The SEC restraining order is in connection with an ongoing worldwide investment pyramid scheme targeting members of the Asian-American Community. Thereafter, FINRA commenced its own investigation into whether Chen while registered with a FINRA firm or had engaged in any violations of the securities laws. Until April 2012, Chen was registered with World Group Securities, Inc. Thereafter, and until August 2012, Chen was associated with Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc. (Transamerica).

FINRA alleged that it made numerous requests seeking information and testimony from Chen. In spite of FINRA’s numerous requests, Chen failed to provide testimony and certain information requested by staff. Due to Chen’s failure to provide documents, FINRA brought the instant complaint.

An Examination of LPL Financial’s Recent Regulatory Woes

October 7, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

LPL Financial, LLC (LPL) is one of the largest independent brokerage firms in the United States employing approximately 13,840 registered reps and advisers. However, the firm’s growth has come with a host of regulatory actions focusing on the firm’s alleged supervisory failures.

Recently, InvestmentNews reported that the firm was hit with a $2 million fine, and ordered to pay $820,000 in restitution, for failing to maintain adequate books and records documenting variable annuity exchanges. The mounting firm fines have led to flat second quarter earnings at LPL. The firm has stated that the company is instituting enhanced procedures with a view to ensuring that surrender charges incurred in connection with variable annuity exchange transactions are accurately reflected in the firm’s books and records as well as in any disclosures given to clients. The firm is also purportedly taking steps to make sure that its advisers are adequately documenting the basis for their variable annuity recommendations.

LPL has been on the radar of FINRA and several state regulators that have focused on the firm’s supervisory and other record systems as well as examining sales of investment products, including non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs). In February 2013, LPL settled with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to pay at least $2 million in restitution and $500,000 in fines concerning the firm’s non-traded REIT practices. In addition, in the last year, FINRA has fined LPL Financial $7.5 million for significant e-mail system failures. Moreover, we have reported on numerous LPL registered representatives who have been fined over the past year for a variety of misconduct ranging from misappropriation of funds, sales of alternative investments, selling away activities, and private placements.