Merrill Lynch

FINRA Bars Former Merrill Lynch Broker Michael Highfill Over Outside Business Activities

September 28, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) brought and enforcement action against broker Michael Highfill (Highfill) (FINRA No. 2015045652501) resulting in a bar from the securities industry alleging that Highfill failed to provide FINRA staff with information and documents requested. The failure to provide those documents and information to FINRA resulted in an automatic bar from the industry. FINRA’s document requests related to the regulators investigation into claims the Highfill solicited and accepted a loan from an elderly customer and that he also failed to disclose an outside business activity to his member firm.

FINRA’s investigation appears to stem from Highfill’s termination from Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Merrill Lynch) in May 2015. At that time Merrill Lynch filed a Form U5 termination notice with FINRA stating in part that the firm discharged Highfill under circumstances where there was allegations that Highfill solicited a loan from a client and failed to disclose outside business activities. It is unclear the nature of the outside business activities from publicly available information at this time.

Highfill entered the securities industry in 1999. From August 2005 until August 2008, Highfill was associated with Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated. Thereafter, from July, 2008, until May 2015, Highfill was associated as a registered representative with Merrill Lynch out of the firm’s Ridgeland, Mississippi office.

FINRA Bars Merrill Lynch Broker Kai Cheng Over Unauthorized Trading Investigation

September 2, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) barred (Case No. 201303930510) broker Kai Cheng (Cheng) concerning the broker’s failure to respond to requests for information concerning the regulators investigation into claims that Cheng engaged in conduct including entering into personal financial transactions with a customer, using a personal email address to communicate with a customer, and unauthorized trading in a customer account. In addition, to the FINRA bar Cheng has one employment separation and one customer dispute disclosed on his BrokerCheck record. The customer complaint contains allegations of unsuitable investments, failure to follow instructions, unauthorized trading, and omissions of material facts.

Cheng first entered the securities industry in 2005 as a broker with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Merrill Lynch) with the title of “First Vice President” and worked there until he was discharged in 2015. On March 2, 2015, Merrill Lynch filed a Uniform Termination Notice (Form U5) that reflected that Cheng was discharged on February 4, 2015. According to FINRA the Form U5 stated that Cheng was terminated for conduct including entering into personal financial transactions with a customer, using a personal email address to communicate with a customer and unauthorized trading in a customer account.

FINRA then sought to investigate these allegations and during the course of FINRA’s examination, the agency sent a letter to Cheng’s counsel pursuant to FINRA Rule 8210 requesting Respondent to provide on the record testimony. According to FINRA Cheng failed to provide testimony. Cheng’s failure to appear resulted in a bar from the industry.

SEC Charged 36 Brokerage Firms Over Municipal Bond Offerings

August 12, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced enforcement actions against 36 municipal bond underwriting brokerage firms for material misstatements and omissions in municipal bond offering documents. The SEC offered favorable settlement terms to municipal bond underwriters and issuers who self-reported securities law violations leading to the settlements.

The SEC alleged that between 2010 and 2014, 36 brokerage and financial firms violated federal securities laws by selling municipal bonds using offering documents that contained materially false statements or omissions about the bond issuers’ compliance with their obligation to disclosure. The firms were also alleged by the SEC to have failed to conduct adequate due diligence to identify the misstatements and omissions before offering and selling the bonds to their customers.

The municipal bond market is a $3.7 trillion market. Continuing disclosure provides municipal bond investors with information about the solvency and financial fitness of issuers on an ongoing basis. The SEC had previously identified issuers’ failure to comply with their continuing disclosure obligations as being a major challenge for investors seeking up to date information about their municipal bond holdings.

Gana LLP Investigation: Broker Duane Smith

July 31, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Duane Smith (Smith) has been the subject of at least two customer complaint and one employment separation. The customer complaints against Smith allege a number of securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments, negligence, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty among other claims.

Smith entered the securities industry in 1995 and is both a licensed broker and a principal. From 1995, until September 2008, Smith was registered with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Merrill Lynch). Upon termination from Merrill Lynch the firm filed a Uniform Termination form (Form U5) stating that the reason for the firm’s termination of Smith was due to allegations by the firm that Smith violated the firm’s policies by facilitating a client investment in an account that was held outside of Merrill Lynch, recorded information on blank authorization forms previously signed by a client, and failed to obtain supervisory approval for correspondence that he sent to multiple clients. Thereafter, in March 2014, Smith became associated with Neidger, Tuck, and Bruner, Inc. in Englewood, Colorado.

It is important for investors to know that all advisers have an obligation and responsibility to deal fairly with investors including making suitable investment recommendations. In order to make suitable recommendations the broker must have a reasonable basis for recommending the product or security based upon the broker’s investigation of the investments properties including its benefits, risks, tax consequences, and other relevant factors. In addition, the broker must also understand the customer’s specific investment objectives to determine whether or not the specific product or security being recommended is appropriate for the customer based upon their needs.

Thomas Buck Barred From the Securities Industry Over Unfair Commission Practices

July 28, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

Our firm has been tracking the developments related to Thomas Buck’s termination from Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Merrill Lynch), now known as Bank of America, NA (Bank of America) under highly unusual circumstances. (See Top Merrill Lynch Broker Thomas Buck Terminated Under Unusual Circumstances; Update On Broker Thomas Buck Investigation). Now, according to records kept by FINRA, Buck has accepted a bar from the securities industry.

Buck’s downfall played out quickly. Buck was terminated from Merrill Lynch on March 6, 2015, shocking colleagues. At the time of his termination there was only one customer complaint against Buck steaming from a dispute in 2006. Now, over the past four months customers have filed 11 additional complaints against him. All of the complaints have similar allegations against Buck in that the customers allege that during a time period Buck engage in unauthorized trades in corporate debt and equities. Several of the complaints allege excessive trading and misrepresentations.

Buck’s team managed nearly $1.5 billion in investor assets and was one of the Merrill Lynch’s largest producers. According to FINRA, Buck engaged in misrepresentations and other misconduct in the handling of customer accounts. FINRA alleged that beginning by at least 2009, Buck used unethical and improper business practices to generate increased commissions and enhance his status as a top-producing broker. According to FINRA, Buck held customer assets in commission-based accounts instead of fee-based accounts for the sole purpose of generating higher revenues even though he knew that some customers would have paid substantially lower fees by using fee-based accounts. In fact, FINRA goes on to allege that Buck misled customers about the relative costs of fee-based or commission-based trading for their accounts. In addition to these claims FINRA alleged that Buck exercised discretion in customer accounts without written or oral authorization, and made unauthorized trades in certain accounts.

Update On Broker Thomas Buck Investigation

July 24, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

As we previously reported, (See Top Merrill Lynch Broker Thomas Buck Terminated Under Unusual Circumstances) news sources have been investigating the termination of financial advisor Thomas Buck (Buck) and his daughter Ann Buck by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Merrill Lynch), now known as Bank of America, NA (Bank of America) under circumstances that some would consider unusual.

Buck’s team managed nearly $1.5 billion in investor assets, was one of the company’s largest producers, and has been associated with Merrill Lynch since. Despite all these factors that would likely lead Merrill Lynch to continue to wish employ Buck, allegations were made that Buck executed unauthorized trades in client accounts.

Buck’s termination happened on March 6, 2015, and shocked colleagues. One person was quoted in news articles foreshadowed additional developments saying “There is a lot more out there. I think it’s a little bit of heavy-handedness on Merrill’s part. Tom was shocked.”

Why Professional Athletes are Common Victims of Investment Fraud

June 29, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

Certain groups have been particularly vulnerable to advisors who engage in investment fraud. Among those groups well known are senior citizens who may have diminished capacity. Another group that serves as a common target are affinity frauds. In an affinity fraud the scammer preys upon members of a group or community such as members of certain religions or ethnic communities.

However, lessor known common victims of investment fraud schemes are professional athletes. Athletes are often preyed upon by bad advisors because they possess attributes that tend to allow the advisor to take advantage of their client. Athletes tend to be unsophisticated in the area of securities and investing often never having previous investment experience prior to going pro. In addition, athletes have busy schedules and demands on their time that do not allow the athlete to closely monitor or investigate each recommendation being made to them. Accordingly, athletes tend to place their trust in their professional advisor that they know what they are doing. Finally, athletes represent large, multi-million dollar opportunities to fraudsters.

In a recent OnWallStreet article, the unfortunate tales of several athletes were told. Among those athletes whose story were mentioned was Doug Mirabelli who recently won his arbitration dispute with Merrill Lynch where the firm was ordered to pay more than $1.2 million. The award came after Mirabelli and his wife claimed that their income portfolio, comprised of equities pledged against Merrill Lynch-owned mortgages, suffered losses that caused a liquidation. Their financial advisor Phil Scott was accused of providing “inappropriate investment advice” for securities including investments in Alliance Resource Partners, Apollo Investment Corp. and Copano Energy LLC.

Former Merrill Lynch Advisor Roderick Yzaguirre Accused of Stealing Millions From Clients

June 28, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Roderick Yzaguirre (Yzaguirre) has been the subject of at least 10 customer complaints and one firm termination. Customers have filed complaints against Yzaguirre alleging that the broker made misrepresentations concerning investments and misappropriated their funds among other claims. To date investors have accused Yzaguirre of misappropriating approximately $3,000,000 in client funds with the true extent of Yzaguirre alleged misconduct still unknown.

Yzaguirre has been a FINRA broker since 1994. From October 2009, through April 2015, Yzaguirre has been associated with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Merrill Lynch) out of their Ontario, California branch. Merrill Lynch accused Yzaguirre of conduct involving potential misappropriation of client funds and misrepresentations of securities at the time of his termination from the firm.

Under the FINRA rules, a brokerage firm owes a duty to properly monitor and supervise its employees in order to detect and prevent brokers from engaging in illegal investments activity. In order to properly supervise their brokers each firm is required to have procedures in order to monitor the activities of each advisor’s activities and interaction with the public. Investment schemes often occur where brokerage firms either fail to put in place a reasonable supervisory system or fail to actually implement that system. Supervisory failures allow brokers to engage in unsupervised misconduct that can include all manner improper conduct.

Broker Investigation: Patrick McGrath Former Oppenheimer & Co. Advisor

May 31, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Patrick McGrath (McGrath) has been the subject of at least four customer complaints, two regulatory actions, and one termination over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against McGrath alleging a litany of securities law violations including that the broker received loans and failed to pay the client timely, made unsuitable investments, and unauthorized trades, among other claims.

McGrath entered the securities industry in 1984 with brokerage firm Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated. Thereafter, from July 2003, until April 2009, 2007 through June 2009, McGrath was associated with brokerage firm Wachoiva Securities, LLC. Then, from April 2009 until January 2014, McGrath was a representative with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (Oppenheimer). Finally since February 2014, McGrath has been registered with Northeast Securities, Inc.

McGrath was permitted to resign from Oppenheimer in January 2014 due to his failure to finalize arrangements to repay money he borrowed from an Oppenheimer customer. There are also two regulatory actions against McGrath. One is a 30 day suspension and a $10,000 fine by the Florida Office of Financial Regulation based on allegations that McGrath engaged in prohibited business practices. FINRA also suspended McGrath for four months and fined him $10,000 concerning allegations that he borrowed money from a client contrary to Oppenheimer’s compliance policies that bar loan arrangements.

Why the Investing Public Falsely Believes Advisors Are Fiduciaries

May 13, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The investor advocacy bar association PIABA (the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association) has recently issued a report called “Major Investor Losses Due to Conflicted Advice: Brokerage Industry Advertising Creates the Illusion of Fiduciary Duty.” The PIABA report argues that the brokerage industry uses false advertising to convey to investors that the firms have a fiduciary duty to their clients only then to do a 180 turn when sued to claim that no such duty exists.

According to the report, some of the largest firms in the United States are falsely advertise in this fashion including Merrill Lynch, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Fidelity, Ameriprise, Allstate Financial, Berthel Fisher, and Charles Schwab. The report claimed that all of these firms “advertise in a fashion that is designed to lull investors into the belief that they are being offered the services of a fiduciary.”

In the wake of the financial crisis of 2008, the Dodd-Frank legislation authorized the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) to pass a fiduciary duty rule that would apply to brokers, as opposed to only financial advisors. Most investors do not realize and are usually shocked to learn that there broker only has an obligation to recommend “suitable” investments, and not to work in their client’s best interests. Currently, the fiduciary duty rule only applies to financial advisors (and brokers under certain circumstances).