L.m. Kohn & Company

Broker Kenneth Nahrstedt in L.m. Kohn & Company Firm Has Customer Complaint

March 5, 2025 | by Staff Attorney

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Kenneth Nahrstedt (Nahrstedt), currently associated with L.m. Kohn & Company, has at least one disclosable event. These events include one tax lien, alleging that Nahrstedt recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a final customer complaint on January 29, 2025.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Nahrstedt consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that he submitted a false attestation to his member firm and caused the firm to maintain inaccurate books and records. The findings stated that the firm received an email from an individual posing as a firm customer. The email requested a $500,000 wire transfer from the customer’s account to a bank in Mexico for the purported purpose of purchasing an apartment there. Unbeknownst to the firm, an imposter had sent the email to the firm without the customer’s authorization. To initiate the wire transfer request, Nahrstedt signed a ‘Change of Ownership’ form in which he falsely attested that he had spoken with the customer in connection with the requested wire transfer, as was required by firm policy. In fact, Nahrstedt had not spoken with the customer concerning the wire transfer. As a result of Nahrstedt’s false statement, the firm processed the $500,000 wire transfer from the customer’s account to an unknown third party.

Broker Kenneth Nahrstedt in L.m. Kohn & Company Firm Has Customer Complaint

February 13, 2025 | by Staff Attorney

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Kenneth Nahrstedt (Nahrstedt), currently associated with L.m. Kohn & Company, has at least one disclosable event. These events include one tax lien, alleging that Nahrstedt recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a final customer complaint on January 29, 2025.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Nahrstedt consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that he submitted a false attestation to his member firm and caused the firm to maintain inaccurate books and records. The findings stated that the firm received an email from an individual posing as a firm customer. The email requested a $500,000 wire transfer from the customer’s account to a bank in Mexico for the purported purpose of purchasing an apartment there. Unbeknownst to the firm, an imposter had sent the email to the firm without the customer’s authorization. To initiate the wire transfer request, Nahrstedt signed a ‘Change of Ownership’ form in which he falsely attested that he had spoken with the customer in connection with the requested wire transfer, as was required by firm policy. In fact, Nahrstedt had not spoken with the customer concerning the wire transfer. As a result of Nahrstedt’s false statement, the firm processed the $500,000 wire transfer from the customer’s account to an unknown third party.

There are Recent Customer Complaints with Broker Imdadur Rahman in Firm L.m. Kohn & Company

February 7, 2025 | by Staff Attorney

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Imdadur Rahman (Rahman), previously associated with L.m. Kohn & Company, has at least one disclosable event. These events include one tax lien, alleging that Rahman recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a final customer complaint on June 10, 2024.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Rahman consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that he facilitated a senior customer’s designation of Rahman’s wife as beneficiary on two accounts. The findings stated that the customer was not Rahman’s family member and Rahman failed to provide written notice to his member firm of the customers designation of Rahman’s wife as beneficiary. The findings also stated that Rahman falsified the customer’s beneficiary forms by identifying his wife as the customer’s niece. Rahman engaged in this conduct to prevent his firm from identifying the designation of his wife as a prohibited beneficiary designation. The findings also included that Rahman engaged in an undisclosed OBA by providing services to the customer, such as buying furniture, groceries, and clothing, driving him to appointments, and sending his mail to his relative. Rahman told the customer and the relative that he could not be compensated for these services directly because the customer was his customer, but instead directed them to write checks to Rahman’s wife, which they did, totaling at least $116,000. Rahman did not provide prior written notice to or receive approval from his firm for his OBA. FINRA found that Rahman accepted gifts from the customer in circumvention of firm policy. In addition to the monetary compensation Rahman received from the customer through his wife, he also accepted monetary gifts from him via payments from the customer to vendors and credit card companies on Rahman’s behalf. Rahman repeatedly told the customer about his outstanding bills and accepted the customer’s payment of those bills totaling more than $47,000. Rahman failed to disclose these gifts to the firm and falsely stated on compliance questionnaires that he had not received unreported gifts.