FINRA

Former Ryan Beck and Oppenheimer Financial Advisor William Bucci Barred From the Financial Industry

December 5, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently barred financial advisor William D. Bucci (Bucci) for allegedly accepting 19 personal loans totaling $635,000 from nine customers in violation of FINRA rules. Bucci also allegedly willfully failed to amend his Form U4 to disclose material facts relating to two judgments that were entered against him. In addition, customers have filed complaints alleging that Bucci sold illegal promissory notes.

Bucci has been licensed as registered securities representative since 1983. From April 27, 2002, until April 2007, Bucci was a registered representative with Ryan Beck & Co. (Ryan Beck). Thereafter, and until August 2011, Bucci was registered with Oppenheimer & Co. (Oppenheimer). Finally, from August 2011, until May 2012, Bucci was registered with Financial Network Investment Corp. (Financial Network). Bucci’s public disclosures list that he is involved in a number of companies and other business activities including Delaware Valley Financial Group, LLC, DVFG Advisors, LLC, Chestnut Hill College Board of Trustees, Gennaro Vuono & William Bucci, 3010 Ocean Ave, LLC, 510 Seacliff LLC, 210 Sea Spay LLC, and 216 Sea Spay LLC.

FINRA alleged that between May 2004 and December 2010, Bucci accepted 19 personal loans from nine brokerage customers totaling $635,000. FINRA found that all of the personal loans paid annual interest of at least 10 percent and had terms of up to five years. In one instance, Bucci was accused of borrowing $425,000 in ten loan transactions from an elderly retired couple who were customers of Bucci at Ryan Beck and Oppenheimer. FINRA alleged that none of the elderly couple’s loans have been repaid. Further, according to FINRA, the elderly couple loaned Bucci a portion of the $425,000 by withdrawing money from their brokerage accounts and securing a second mortgage on their home. FINRA found that Bucci’s conduct violated NASD Rules 2370 and 2110 and FINRA Rules 3240 and 2010.

Former LPL Financial Broker Stephen Brown Accused of Selling Private Real Estate Investments

December 3, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently barred broker Stephen Michael Brown (Brown) for failing to comply with FINRA’s requests for information concerning allegations that Brown engaged in the unlawful sale of securities. Specifically, at least two customers had brought complaints against Brown alleging that Brown had solicited them to invest in private real estate investments in violation of industry rules.

Brown was formerly registered with FINRA firm LPL Financial Corporation (LPL Financial) from 1989 through May 2009. Thereafter, Brown became associated with Brewer Financial Services, LLC until November 2010. Finally, from November 2010, until May 2011, Brown was an associated person of Best Direct Securities, LLC (Best Direct) a currently inactive FINRA firm. Brown’s public disclosures list Brown as the owner of Steve Brown Ent., a company engaged in real estate business.

The accusations made against Brown are consistent with a “selling away” securities violation. Brokers are required to have their firms approve all securities transactions they participate in, even private financial transactions. Thus, when a broker fails to notify the firm of securities activities he or she “sells away” from the firm. Selling away is prohibited under FINRA Rule 3040, as well as other securities laws. The most common securities products solicited in selling away schemes are private placements and promissory note.

Coker & Palmer Broker Sanctioned Over Allegations of Failure to Conduct Due Diligence on Private Placement Offering

November 26, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently sanctioned broker Michael A. Barina (Barina) over allegations that Barina failed to conduct reasonable due diligence into the offering a private placement security. In addition, FINRA alleged that the broker commingled certain funds.

Barina first became registered with FINRA in 1999. Barina was registered from November 13, 2009, through November 14, 2011, with Coker & Palmer, Inc. (Coker & Palmer). In November 2011, Barina became registered with Aegis Capital Corp. until May 2013. Thereafter, Barina was registered with Merrimac Corporate Securities, Inc. until October 2013.

Brokerage firms and brokers are responsible for conducting due diligence on all securities recommended by a broker. The due diligence requirement is heightened where the investment recommendation is a private placement offering or other type of non-public offering where there is no public information available and brokerage firm is acting as the underwriter of the securities.

Michael Blake Sanctioned Over Sales of Real Estate Securities

November 17, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently sanctioned broker Michael James Blake (Blake) over allegations that Blake engaged in the unlawful sale of securities including, upon information and belief, securities linked to Longest Drive, LLC and Grace Communities, LLC. According to FINRA, Blake participated in private securities transactions involving the investment of more than $3.2 million by approximately 28 investors in 3 investment contracts without providing prior written notice to his firms of his proposed roles in the transactions. FINRA imposed a $10,000 fine and banned Blake from association with any broker-dealer for one year.

The allegations against Blake are consistent with a “selling away” violation. Selling away occurs when a securities broker solicits securities that were not approved by the broker’s affiliated firm. Selling away is a violation of FINRA Rule 3040. The most common securities sold away from brokerage firms involve private placements and promissory notes. Investors are often completed unaware that the broker’s sales activity is improper. In addition, the investor does not learn that the broker’s activities were wrongful until the investment scheme is publicized, the broker is sanctioned, or the broker stops returning client calls.

FINRA’s order states that between approximately February 2006 and June 2007, Blake recommended to customers to invest $3,200,000 in real estate properties being developed by entity “GC”, which is believed to stand for Grace Communities. The invested funds were provided by 28 investors. According to FINRA, 6 persons invested $250,000 in Development 1 between August and November 2006, 3 persons invested $200,000 in Development 2 in October and November 2006, and 23 persons invested approximately $2,755,000 in Development 3 between February 2006 and June 2008. According to FINRA, as of September 9, 2013, investors in Blake’s real estate investments have not received a return of their principal or any interest or other payments.

Broker James Tallant Suspended Over Allegations of Excessive Trading and Quantitative Unsuitable Investments

November 12, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) suspended broker James Glenn Tallant (Tallant) for three months and fined him $15,000 including the disgorgement of $8,560.44 in commissions. FINRA alleged that Tallant exercised discretionary trading authority without written authorization in four securities accounts in violation of NASD Conduct Rule 2510(b) and FINRA Rule 2010. In addition, FINRA found that Tallant engaged in excessive trading and quantitatively unsuitable in violation of NASD Conduct Rule 2310 and IM-2310-2.

Tallant has been a registered representative with Morgan Stanley from 2005 through July 2013. FINRA alleged that Tallant’s securities violations involved a 49 years old woman, divorced, and with two children. The client owned and operated a women’s boutique clothing store and had an annual income of approximately $140,000 and an estimated net worth of approximately $300,000.

The client’s IRA account investment objectives capital appreciation and aggressive income. FINRA found that between March 2009, and March 2010, Tallant executed 39 purchase and sale securities transactions in the client’s individual account amounting to $147,366.50 with gross commissions totaling $8,739.56. In the client’s three other accounts Tallant’s trading totaled between $99,000 and $261,000 over the same time period. In 2009 alone, Tallant’s total gross commissions were $200,927.

Merrimac Corporate Securities, Inc.’s President and CEO Suspended Over Failure to Supervise Allegations

November 11, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Stephen Douglas Pizzuti (Puttuti) and David Walton Matthews, Jr. (Matthews) were recently suspended for three months by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over allegations that Pizzuti failed to adequately inquire into Richard’s Pizzuti (Richard) and Daniel Voccia’s (Voccia) outside business activities and involvement in private securities transactions despite his knowledge of their activities. To that end, Pizzuti failed to follow up on “red flags” regarding Richard’s and Voccia’s investment activities. In addition, FINRA also found that Matthews, Merrimac’s Chief Compliance Officer, also failed to supervise Richard and Voccia investment activities.

Pizzuti controls Merrimac Corporate Securities, Inc. (Merrimac) and was the firm’s Chef Executive Officer during the relevant period. Pizzuti, as the managing principal of Merrimac and the firm’s CEO, had overall responsibility for the Merrimac’s compliance policies. Matthews became President of Merrimac in early 2004. Matthews was also the Merrimac’s Chief Compliance Officer until mid-2008 but thereafter and remained the Merrimac’s President. Matthews reports directly to Pizzuti.

FINRA found that from at least 2006 to April 2009, Pizzuti failed to reasonably supervise the outside business activities and private securities transactions of Richard and Voccia. Both Richard and Voccia were registered representatives at Merrimac.

FINRA Arbitration Panel Awards BBVA Securities’ Investors $1.2 Million

November 8, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Arbitration Panel has awarded damages to investors in the amount of $1.2 million in compensatory damages and cost of fees associated with the arbitration. The alleged claim was asserted against BBVA Securities of Puerto Rico, Inc. (BBVA Securities) and employees of the brokerage firm.

BBVA Securities is a brokerage firm in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

The Claimants asserted breach of fiduciary duty, unsuitable investments, churning and excessive trading, failure to supervise and gross negligence. These causes of actions related to allegedly unsuitable naked option trading strategy combined with the use of margin which caused losses in the investor’s accounts.

What are Leveraged or Non-Traditional ETFs?

November 6, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

A leveraged Exchange Traded Fund (non-traditional or leveraged ETFs) is a security that employs debt, or leverage, in order to amplify the returns of an underlying stock position. Leveraged ETFs are generally available for most security indexes such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100. A leveraged ETF with 300% leverage will return 3% if the underlying index returns 1%. Nontraditional ETFs can also be designed to return the inverse of the benchmark.

Leveraged ETFs are generally used only for short term trading. The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) has warned that most leveraged ETFs reset daily, meaning that they are designed to achieve their stated objectives on a daily basis. As a result, the performance of nontraditional ETFs held over the long term can differ significantly from the performance of their underlying index or benchmark during the same period. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has acknowledged that leveraged ETF carry significant risks and are inherent complexity of the products. Accordingly, FINRA advises brokers that nontraditional ETFs are typically not suitable for retail investors.

Recently, FINRA sanctioned and suspended broker Michael E. French (French) over allegations that the broker recommended unsuitable transactions in leveraged and inverse ETFs in the accounts of elderly customers. FINRA also alleged that French held the leveraged ETFs in his customers’ accounts for extended periods contrary to Wells Fargo Advisor’s (Wells Fargo) written supervisory procedures.

FINRA Files Regulatory Action Against Beverly Hills Broker Bambi Holzer

October 31, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) filed a civil enforcement action on October 18, 2013 against Bambi Holzer, a formerly registered broker and investment advisor in Beverly Hills, California. FINRA alleged in its complaint that between February and March 2008, Holzer, then a broker at Wedbush Securities, Inc. in Los Angeles, made unsuitable recommendations to seven of her clients to purchase speculative and illiquid investments issued by Provident Shale Royalties 8, LLC. The complaint further alleged that after investing in Provident 8, Holzer’s clients’ accounts were overly concentrated in the highly risky private placement. FINRA highlighted that one of the seven victims of Holzer’s alleged misconduct was an 86 year-old widow who is now deceased. This particular investor’s objectives were income and preservation of principal, meaning the risky and illiquid Provident 8 was blatantly outside the scope of her investment objectives.

In connection with these unsuitable recommendations, Holzer is accused of either knowingly or negligently submitting false net worth information regarding six of the seven customers. Additionally, FINRA alleged that between April 2010 and August 2012, Holzer willfully failed to disclose an arbitration award and judgment and a pending regulatory action on her Form U4, a required regulatory filing. Holzer is also accused of providing false testimony during on-the-record interviews conducted by FINRA.

Early in 2008, Wedbush Securities entered into an agreement with Provident 8 that allowed the investment firm to sell Provident 8’s privately issued securities. Holzer subsequently began recommending Provident 8 to her customers and received a 100 percent commission for those clients that invested. Based on allegations that Provident had commingled assets and investor funds, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a Temporary Restraining Order against Provident Royalties, LLC in July 2009. Provident ultimately filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and Holzer’s customers’ investments in Provident 8 became worthless.

Broker Sanctioned Over Unsuitable Sales of Private Placement Securities

October 28, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

All brokers and broker-dealers have an obligation to ensure that their investment or investment strategy recommendation is suitable for the customer. All sales efforts must be reasonable and appropriate for the investor based upon the investor’s risk tolerance, investment objectives, age, financial circumstances, other investment holdings, experience, and other facts or information disclosed by the investor.

With respect to the sale of private placements, regulators have found significant problems in the due diligence and sales efforts of some brokerage firms when selling private placements to investors. These problems include fraud, misrepresentations and omissions in sales materials and offering documents, conflicts of interest, and suitability abuses.

In order for a brokerage firm to meet its due diligence obligation, the brokerage firm must make reasonable efforts to gather and analyze information both about the private placement and the customer the security is being sold to. Private Placements are considered “alternative investments” and are inherently speculative. Consequently, a broker must also ensure that an investment recommendation in a private placement is suitable for the particular customer. The broker must ensure that the client can withstand the risk taken and not imperil the client’s account by concentrating their assets in speculative investments.