FINRA

Darrell Frazier Accused of Selling Variable Annuities by Misleading Customers

September 28, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Darrell G. Frazier (Frazier) was recently barred from the securities industry by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over allegations that Frazier made fraudulent statements in the sales of variable annuities. Frazier is also alleged to have made unsuitable variable annuity sale recommendations to customers.

Frazier first became registered with a FINRA member firm in March 1988. Frazier was registered with Park Avenue Securities LLC from July 2002 through June 2010. From August 2010 through May 2011, Frazier was associated with MML Investors Services, LLC.

FINRA alleged that from 2004 to at least 2009, Frazier made materially false and misleading statements in connection with recommending customers purchase variable annuity products issued by Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. A variable annuity is a contract where an insurance company agrees to make periodic payments to an investor either immediately or at some future date. The purchase of a variable annuity contract either involves a single purchase payment or a series of purchase payments.

FINRA Publishes Fraud Susceptibility in the United States Study

September 25, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently released a report detailing the American public’s susceptibility to financial fraud. The Financial Fraud Research Center estimated that fraud costs the American people over $50 billion a year without including the cost of efforts to prevent and prosecute fraud.

The report entitled, Financial Fraud and Fraud Susceptibility in the United States made two summary claims. The first claim is that ever present fraud solicitations coupled with the inability of people to recognize the signs of fraud place a large number of Americans at risk, especially older Americans. Second, policy maker’s inability to obtain an accurate measure of financial fraud frustrates our understanding of its prevalence and our ability to prevent fraud.

The study highlighted that many Americans cannot identify classic “red flags” of fraud. For instance, the study cited that many Americans lack an understanding of what a reasonable rate of return on a investment would be. The study found that over 4 in 10 people participating in the study found promises of a annual return of 110% or a “fully guaranteed” investment appealing. Participants found such promises appealing even though returns of over 100% are highly improbable and virtually no investment is guaranteed. This lack of understanding leaves many Americans susceptible to fraudulent sales pitches. The study also found that older Americans, age 65 and older, are more likely to be targeted by fraudsters and 34% more likely to lose money than people in their forties.

Conrad Bautista Barred From Financial Industry for Alleged Private Placements Sales

September 23, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Conrad Tambalo Bautista (Bautista) resolved charges brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) concerning the sale of private securities and possible involvement in a fraudulent investment scheme by accepting a bar from the securities industry.

Bautista has been associated with seven FINRA member firms including his most recent employer, CUSO Financial Services, L.P. (CUSO) from January 2010 to March 2013. Prior to CUSO, Bautista was associated with SWBC Investment Services, LLC, Financial Network Investment Corporation, and Wells Fargo Investments, LLC. Bautista obtained Series 6, 7, and 63 securities licenses.

Bautista’s public records do not disclose any businesses, other than CUSO, that Bautista was involved in. However, in February 2013, a customer allegedly filed a complaint against Bautista involving potential securities related misconduct. Subsequently, FINRA sent Bautista requests for information concerning the substance of the customer complaint. The FINRA letter sought information into whether Bautista may have engaged in fraudulent investment schemes. In addition, FINRA had information that suggested that Bautista may have been involved in undisclosed outside business activities and private securities transactions that may have involved borrowing money from customers.

Private Placements – FINRA Warns Evaluate the Risks Before Investing

September 21, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Every year, companies across the United States raise hundreds of billions of dollars selling securities in non-public offerings that are exempt from registration under the federal securities laws. These offerings, known as private placements, can be a tremendous source of capital for both small and large business. However, according to FINRA, investors should be aware that private placements can be illiquid and are very risky with the potential to lose most or all of your investment.

Fraud and Sales Practices Abuses

For over three years, FINRA has been investigating private placements and has uncovered fraud and sales practice abuses related to private placements that resulted in sanctions of individual brokers and financial institutions for providing investors inaccurate information relating to private placements. In addition, some materials omitted information necessary for investors to make informed investment decisions. Finally some firms failed to conduct adequate investigations into whether the private placements were suitable for customers.

FINRA Arbitration Panel Awards Investors $3.1 Million Against Citigroup Due to Failure to Supervise Selling Away Activities

September 18, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration panel ruled that Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) must pay $3.1 million to a Florida couple who alleged that their financial advisor, Scott King (King), solicited them to invest in real estate developments. The case was filed by Dr. Nasirdin Madhany and his wife, Zeenat Madhany, alleging negligent supervision, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and breach of contract. The panel’s decision represents an important win for consumers and refutation of common arguments employed by the industry to avoid responsibility for their employee’s wrongful conduct.

The case involved a typical, and all too common, “selling away” scenario. Selling away occurs where a broker sells securities to customers that are not approved by the brokerage firm. Selling away investments represent a substantial risk to the investing public because brokerage firms do not record the transactions on their books and records and do not supervise the activity to ensure that the investment is appropriate for the customer.

Brokerage firms usually defend selling away cases by arguing that they were not aware of the securities transactions and therefore cannot be found liable. Firms also argue that they do not know the broker’s customer because in many cases the investor does not have a brokerage account with the firm. Therefore, the firm argues that it cannot be responsible for investment losses occurring to investors they do not know and away from the firm.

Adam Gana is Quoted in the Wall Street Journal Reuters After having Received $2.8 Million Award

September 16, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Wall Street Journal and Reuters quoted managing partner, Adam J. Gana after he received a $2.8 Million award in Jacobs v. Van Zandt, FINRA Case No. 12-00156. Seven claimants alleged that Robert Van Zandt orchestrated a $35 million ponzi scheme leading to Mr. Van Zandt’s criminal indictment by the New York Attorney General. Mr. Gana was pleased with the victory and the outcome for the claimants. “These are hard working people from the Bronx who did not deserve to be defrauded by Mr. Van Zandt. This type of fraud is rampant in the securities industry and it is up to the regulators and the attorneys to weed it out and bring these people to justice.”

SEC Issues Concerns Over Private Oil and Gas Offerings

September 7, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Private securities offerings of oil and gas ventures pose a substantial danger for investor fraud. According to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), there has been an increase in the number of civil fraud cases related to oil and gas private placements. Investing in private placement offerings carries unique risks and private oil and gas offerings have additional risks for investors to be aware of and to consider.

The SEC’s Investor Alert listed common red flag sales pitches that fraudulent oil and gas investments often make to investors including:

Sales pitches referring to high oil and gas prices;

ACGM, Inc. Settles Charges with FINRA Concerning Misleading Advertising

September 2, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

HKC Securities, Inc., known as ACGM, Inc. (ACGM), and Harold Kenneth Cohen (Cohen) of Palm Beach, Florida, reached a settlement the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over the firm’s use of certain hedge fund sales material that allegedly failed to fairly present the risks and potential disadvantages of hedge fund investing. According to FINRA, the sales materials violated FINRA Rule 2210(d) by only highlighting the hedge fund’s positive features, not providing a sound basis for evaluating the investment, containing exaggerated language, failing to identify the basis for factual statements made, and containing an inadequate discussion of the performance of the funds.

The settlement states that between January 2008 and June 2011, the firm marketed hedge funds to large institutional investors such as educational and other endowment funds. The regulator found that ACGM’s procedures for the review and approval of hedge fund institutional sales material were not reasonably designed or implemented to achieve compliance with FINRA’s content standards for institutional sales material and were not appropriate for a business actively engaged in the third-party marketing of hedge funds. Cohen was the firm’s Chief Compliance Officer and the principal responsible for the review and approval of institutional sales material. The complaint alleges that Cohen failed to adequately supervise the review of sales materials in order to achieve compliance with FINRA’s content standards.

The settlement provided some examples of the alleged misleading and exaggerated content provided to investors. One example referred to a fund as having “significantly outperformed its benchmarks” or a fund’s performance as “remarkable.” Another summary document referred to the performance of the underlying fund managers for a fund of funds over 1-year, 3-year, and 5- year time horizons, even though the fund of funds had only been in operation for approximately three months at the time of the document. Other documents failed to identify the basis for factual statements made and only described the fund as the “#l hedge fund in Israel” and describing another fund as the “#l performing equity market neutral fund in the world in 2005.”

FINRA Finds George Kardaras and Brian Borakowski Sell Echo Canyon, LLC Away From Their Brokerage Firms

August 30, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently entered a default decision against George Alexander Kardaras (Kardaras) and Brian Matt Borakowski (Borakowski) after having alleged that the two brokers perpetrated a Ponzi scheme. FINRA found that the two solicited at least 12 customers over four years to invest more than $665,000 in total in Echo Canyon promissory notes. The notes bore interest rates between 14 to 56 percent and had quarterly, semiannual, and annual maturity dates.

Kardas’ and Borakowski’s scheme involved soliciting customers to purchase promissory notes in Echo Canyon LLC, a limited liability company in Arizona. Kardas and Borakowski told investors that their investment would be used to purchase used vehicles in U.S. auto auctions and shipped to Russia for re-sale. FINRA determined that Kardaras and Borakowski never intended to use the customer funds as represented. Instead, only two automobiles for EchoCanyon in or around late 2007 or early 2008 were actually purchased.

FINRA found that 95 percent of the funds raised, approximately $634,000 were used by the two brokers in order to pay personal expenses, to cover expenses at their employer firms’ branch office businesses, and to make payments to earlier investors in furtherance of the Ponzi scheme.

vFinance Investments Inc. Settles Dispute Concerning Private Placements

August 26, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has settled a dispute with vFinance investments, Inc. (vFinance) concerning several violations of the securities laws including selling private placements in violation of the securities laws, failure to supervise, failure to disclose that the firm had worked with a statutorily disqualified person, and failure to retain and review email communications.

vFinance has been a FINRA member since 1998 has approximately 8 branch offices and employs about 40 registered representatives. The recent settlement is not the first time vFinance has been investigated by regulators. According to CRD records, there have been a total of 16 SEC, state, and FINRA regulatory actions initiated against vFinance in the past ten years.

The recent FINRA allegations concern several alleged violations. First, FINRA alleged that vFinance violated Regulation M. Regulation M is intended to prevent manipulative practices in the course of a securities offering by persons with an interest in the outcome by preventing conduct that could artificially influence a security’s market. In this case, FINRA alleged that vFinance representatives solicited nearly $6 million from investors for the PERF Go-Green Holdings, Inc. (PGOG) private placement. During the offering period, vFinance placed the PGOG’s common stock on the firm’s restricted list in order to avoid any potential conflict. However, despite the PGOG being placed on the firm’s restricted list, 22 customers of two representatives have been accused of selling 255,300 shares of the common stock of PGOG when the issuer was on the firm’s restricted list.