Failure to Supervise

Marylin Meyers Formerly of Allstate Financial Services Suspended Over Selling Away Activities

April 11, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned broker Marylin T. Meyers (Myers) $20,000 and barred her for two years concerning allegations between September 2009, and February 2011, she participated in a series of private securities transactions totaling approximately $1,000,000 without notifying her firm, Allstate Financial Services, LLC (Allstate) or obtaining the firm’s written approval. FINRA alleged that Meyers recommended that five investors invest in On The Edge and she helped facilitate their purchases of On the Edge Notes. On The Edge is a California based company formed to be a supplier of consumer goods such as tents, folding chairs, wagons, and promotional items related to retailers. To date, On The Edge has failed to repay the principal and interest due to the investors.

Meyers first became registered with FINRA in 1986 with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenncr & Smith Incorporated. In 2001, Meyers became associated with Metlife Securities Inc. Thereafter, in July 2004, Meyers joined Allstate until her termination on May 17, 2012.

The allegations against Meyers are typical of a “selling away” violation. A broker sells away from their brokerage firm when they solicit securities that were not approved by the broker’s affiliated firm or recorded on the firm’s books and records. NASD Rule 3040 requires an associated person to provide written notice to the firm prior to participating in any private securities transaction. An associated person is prohibited from participating in any manner in the private securities transaction without the Firm’s approval. Under FINRA Rule 3010, brokerage firms are required to supervise their brokers and implement supervisory procedures reasonably designed to detect and prevent violations of NASD Rule 3040.

National Planning Corporation Broker Matthew Westfall Sanctioned Over Outside Business Activities and Non-Traded REIT Sales

March 28, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned broker Matthew Westfall (Westfall) concerning allegations that from June 2011, through December 2012, while associated with the National Planning Corporation (National Planning), Westfall engaged in business activities outside the scope of his employment with the Firm. FINRA found that Westfall solicited 18 customers to purchase lraqi Dinar currency as an investment without firm approval to engage in this outside business activity. In addition, FINRA found that National Planning had internal guidelines that limited the amount customers were permitted to invest in illiquid investments, such as non-traded Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). According to FINRA, Westfall submitted falsified documents that exaggerated the net worth for customers permitting investments in amounts that National Planning would have otherwise prohibited.

Westfall entered the securities industry in 1983. From 2003 until August 2010, Westfall was associated with Securities America, Inc. From September 2010 to December 2012, Westfall was associated with National Planning. Thereafter, in May 2013, Westfall became associated with Primex

FINRA found that Westfall engaged in an undisclosed outside business activity of selling Dinars to 18 National Planning customers. FINRA alleged that the 18 firm customers purchased $87,954 in Dinars through Wcstfall through a personal account that he had with an online company that sold Dinars. For these sales, Westfall received approximately $8,344 in compensation.

Hantz Financial Services Sanctioned Over Non-Traded REIT Due Diligence Failures

March 27, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned and fined Hantz Financial Services, Inc. (Hantz Financial) $75,000 concerning allegations that between April 2004, until April 2011, Hantz Financial violated FINRA rules by failing to properly enforce its written supervisory procedures for conducting due diligence with respect to a non-exchange traded real estate investment trust (REIT) and by failing to establish and maintain a supervisory system reasonably designed for conducting ongoing due diligence of REITs.

Hantz Financial has been a member of FINRA since 1999 and is headquartered in Southfield, Michigan. The firm employees 276 registered representatives and conducts a general securities business.

A REIT is a corporation or trust that owns income-producing real estate. REITs pool the capital of numerous investors to purchase a portfolio of properties that may include office building, shopping centers, hotels, and apartment buildings that the average investor would not otherwise be able to purchase individually. Shares of non-traded REITs do not trade on a national securities exchange and are generally illiquid for periods of eight years or more. The risks of non-traded REITs are significant and FINRA has issued an Investor Alert warning investors of some of the potential risks.

JP Turner Sanctioned By FINRA Over Non-Traditional ETF Sales and Mutual Fund Switches

March 20, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) ordered J.P. Turner & Company, L.L.C. (JP Turner) to pay $707,559 in restitution to 84 customers for sales of unsuitable leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds (Non-Traditional ETFs) and for excessive mutual fund switches. The current fine and is just one of several sanctions that regulators have brought against JP Turner brokers concerning the firms sales and supervisory practices.

Brad Bennett, FINRA Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement, was quoted in the settlement stating that “Securities firms and their registered reps must understand the complex products they are selling and the risks inherent to the products, and be able to determine if they are suitable for investors before recommending them to retail customers.”

As a background, Non-Traditional ETFs are novel products that have grown significantly in popularity since 2006. By 2009, over 100 Non-Traditional ETFs existed in the market place with total assets of approximately $22 billion. A leveraged ETF seeks to deliver two or three times an index or benchmark return the ETF tracks. Non-Traditional ETFs can also be “inverse” or “short” meaning that the investment returns the opposite of the performance the index or benchmark. While both ETFs and Non-Traditional ETFs track indexes, Non-Traditional ETFs contain significant risks that are not associated with traditional ETFs. Non-Traditional ETFs have additional risks of daily reset, use of leverage, and compounding.

Sterne Agee Financial Services Fined Over Failing to Supervise Excessive Trading or “Churning” Activity

March 7, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) fined SAL Financial Services, Inc. dba Sterne Agee Financial Services, Inc. (Sterne Agee) concerning allegations that Sterne Agee failed to implement reasonable supervisory procedures to detect and prevent excessive trading activity, otherwise known as churning, in client accounts.

Sterne Agee has been a FINRA member since 1986 and the firm’s main office is located in Birmingham, Alabama. Sterne Agee has 137 branch office locations and employs 304 registered representatives.

FINRA alleged that from August 2009, through November 2010, Sterne Agee failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system and enforce written supervisory procedures reasonably designed to identify and prevent unsuitable excessive trading and churning in customer accounts. Specifically, FINRA found that Sterne Agee relied solely on a single exception report with inadequate parameters to identify active accounts with patterns of unsuitable and excessive trading. FINRA alleged that Sterne Agee had access to its clearing firm’s additional exception reports but that Sterne Agee failed to use those reports. Consequently, FINRA concluded that Sterne Agee failed to identify at least thirty-nine accounts where thirty of the instances came from the Ft. Lauderdale, Florida office.

Merriman Capital Sanctioned Over Private Placement and Supervisory Failures

March 5, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned brokerage firm Merriman Capital, Inc. (Merriman) concerning allegations that for more than three years Merriman’s written supervisory procedures were not reasonably designed to achieve compliance the FINRA rules. FINRA alleged that Merriman’s written supervisory procedures failed to describe the specific procedures to be followed and the persons responsible for carrying them out. In addition, according to FINRA, between May 2009, and September 2013, Merriman Capital raised more than $16 million for its parent company through several private offerings of securities even though Merriman did not have written procedures related to the sale of private placements.

Merriman has been a FINRA member since November 1986 and its business is focused on offerings of growth companies and institutional investors. Merriman is headquartered in San Francisco, California and employs fifty-five registered persons.

FINRA alleged that Merriman Capital’s written supervisory procedures, at fifteen pages long, listed legal rules and regulations that had to be complied with but failed to describe the specific procedures to be followed by the firm or how compliance with the procedures would be documented. Further, FINRA found that until June 2011, Merriman written supervisory procedures failed to address private placements even though the selling private placements was a substantial portion of the firm’s business. FINRA found that Merriman failed to address private placements in the firm’s supervisory manual even though Merriman Capital raised more than $16 million for its parent company through several private offerings.

FINRA Alleges Royal Securities Company Had Numerous Supervisory Deficiencies – Part I

March 4, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned brokerage firm Royal Securities Company (Royal Securities) concerning allegations Royal lacked adequate supervision and controls in several areas. FINRA alleged that Royal Securities failed to properly supervise two of its registered representatives, one of which utilized a unitary investment strategy for virtually all of his customers. FIRNA also found that other representative made unsuitable recommendations in three customer accounts.

FINRA alleged that between January 2010 and May 2012, representatives of Royal Securities recommended nontraditional exchange-traded funds (Non-Traditional ETFs) to customers without having a reasonable basis to do so. Further, FINRA found that Royal Securities failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system and training regarding the sale of Non-Traditional ETFs that was reasonably designed to comply with FINRA rules.

Royal Securities has been a FINRA member since September 1982 and the firm’s business lines include hedge funds, an investment advisory business, and a traditional brokerage business. Royal Securities has approximately 41 registered persons operating out of nine offices.

Matrix Capital and Christopher Anci Sanctioned by FINRA Over Variable Annuity Practices

February 27, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

In or about May 2010, a registered representative who concentrated in variable annuities became registered with Matrix Capital Group, Inc. (Matrix) and remained with Matrix until April 2011. According to FINRA, during a one year period the representative recommended 17 customers surrender their existing variable annuities and replace them with another annuity product. FINRA alleged that each customer purchased a new annuity and paid a surrender charge of at least $1,000. In sum, FINRA found that in total the customers paid a total of $70,000 in surrender charges. In addition, FINRA alleged that in 16 of the 17 transactions, the customer forfeited significant death and/or living benefits through the switch.

Matrix’s primary business involved equity agency transactions, mostly for institutional customers and high net worth individuals. Christopher Anci (Anci) joined Matrix in 1996. He has been dually registered with three other firms at various times while registered with Matrix. Anci has been President and a director of Matrix Capital Group since 2004.

As President of the Matrix, Anci had overall supervisory responsibility for the firm’s operations. Also, during the time Anci served as Chief Compliance Officer, until November 2010, Anci was designated in the firm’s written supervisory procedures as the person responsible for reviewing and approving variable annuity sales and exchanges. Even after Matrix hired a new Chief Compliance Officer, according to FINRA Anci remained responsible for the supervision and review of variable annuity transactions.

PNC Investments Fined by FINRA Over Sale of Non-Traditional ETFs

February 24, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned brokerage firm PNC Investments LLC, (PNC) concerning allegations from January 2008, through June 2009, PNC failed to establish a supervisory system, including written procedures, reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the FINRA rules in connection with the sale of leveraged, inverse, and inverse leveraged Exchange-Traded Funds (Non-Traditional ETFs).

Non-Traditional ETFs have grown in popularity since 2006. By April 2009, over 100 Non-Traditional ETFs had been issued with total assets of approximately $22 billion. Leveraged ETFs seek to deliver multiples an index or benchmark the ETF tracks. Some Non-Traditional ETFs are “inverse” or “short” funds that return the opposite of the performance the index or benchmark. ETFs can also be both inverse and leveraged and return a multiple of the inverse performance of a index or benchmark. Non-Traditional ETFs contain significant risks that are not found in traditional ETFs. Non-Traditional ETFs have risks associated with a daily reset, use of leverage, and compounding.

In addition, the performance of Non-Traditional ETFs over long periods of time can differ significantly from the performance of the underlying index or benchmark it tracks. For example, between December 2008, and April 2009, the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index gained two percent while a leveraged ETF seeking to deliver twice the index’s daily return fell six percent. In addition, a related ETF seeking to deliver twice the inverse of the index’s daily return fell by 26 percent over the same period. These risks prompted FINRA to issue a Notice to Members clarifying brokerage firm obligations when selling Non-Traditional ETFs to customers.

Stifel, Nicolaus & Company and Century Securities Associates Fined by Regulator Over Leveraged ETFs

February 12, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) ordered brokerage firms Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (Stifel Nicolaus) and Century Securities Associates, Inc. (Century Securities) to pay combined fines of $550,000 and nearly $475,000 in restitution to 65 customers concerning allegations of the improper sale of leveraged and inverse exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Stifel Nicolaus and Century Securities are affiliates and are both owned by Stifel Financial Corporation.

A leveraged ETF employs debt or leverage in order to increase and magnify the returns of the underlying securities. Leveraged ETFs are generally available for most investment indexes such as the S&P 500, the Dow Jones, commodities, or foreign exchanges. Many leveraged ETFs carry leverage as high as 300% leverage and will typically return 3% if the underlying index returns 1%. Leveraged ETFs can also be designed to return the inverse or opposite of the benchmark.

Leveraged ETFs are generally used and are only appropriate for short term trading. The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) has warned that most leveraged ETFs reset daily, meaning that they are designed to achieve their stated objectives on a daily basis. As a result, the performance of nontraditional ETFs held over the long term can differ significantly from the performance of their underlying index or benchmark during the same period. Thus, even if an index is relatively flat over a period of time, a leveraged ETF may still decline in value during the same period.