breach of fiduciary duty

Broker Complaint Investigation: David Persaud’s Sales Practices

June 6, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker David Persaud (Persaud) a/k/a Dwarka Persaud has been the subject of at least 5 customer complaints and one regulatory action over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Persaud alleging a litany of securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments, unauthorized trades, breach of fiduciary duty, and churning among other claims. Two of these customer complaints were filed recently.

An examination of Persaud’s employment history reveals that Persaud moves from troubled firm to troubled firm. The pattern of brokers moving in this way is sometimes called “cockroaching” within the industry. See More Than 5,000 Stockbrokers From Expelled Firms Still Selling Securities, The Wall Street Journal, (Oct. 4, 2013). In Persaud’s 28 year career he has worked at 21 different firms.

Since 2008 Persaud has been registered with The Concord Equity Group, LLC, Andrew Garrett Inc., Garden State Securities, Inc., and since May 2015, Buckman, Buckman & Reid, Inc.

National Securities Broker Vito Balsamo Under FINRA Investigation Over V.W. Industries Sales

May 6, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has filed a complaint against broker Vito Balsamo (Balsamo) concerning allegations that Balsamo engaged in private securities transactions – also known as “selling away” – in ownership interests in a limited liability company called V.W. Industries, LLC (VWI) without first receiving written approval from his member firm. FINRA also alleged that Balsamo failed to provide testimony requested by FINRA staff.

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by FINRA Balsamo has been the subject of at least 4 customer complaints, 2 criminal matters, one regulatory action, and one judgment and lien over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Balsamo alleging a litany of securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments, unauthorized trades, breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentations and false statements, and churning, among other claims. The claims involve different investment recommendations including claims involving equity securities among other speculative securities.

Balsamo entered the securities industry in 1991. From 1999 until May 2008, Balsamo was associated with Joseph Stevens & Company, Inc. Thereafter, from April 2008, until February 2012, Balsamo was associated with National Securities Corporation (National Securities).

Broker Investigation: Brian Decker Churning Claims

May 5, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Brian Decker (Decker) has been the subject of at least 10 customer complaints and 2 judgments and liens over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Decker alleging a litany of securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments, unauthorized trades, breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentations and false statements, and churning, among other claims. The claims involve different investment recommendations including claims involving equity securities among other speculative securities.

Decker entered the securities industry in 2006 with brokerage firm J.P. Turner & Company, L.L.C. Thereafter, in January 2007 through June 2009, Decker was associated with brokerage firm vFinance Investments, Inc. Finally since September 2009, Decker has been registered with Legend Securities, Inc. in Trinton Falls, New Jersey.

All advisers have a fundamental responsibility to deal fairly with investors including making suitable investment recommendations. When brokers engage in churning the investment trading activity in the client’s account serves no reasonable purpose for the investor and is transacted to profit the broker through the generation of commission payments. The elements to establish a churning claim, which is considered a species of securities fraud, are excessive transactions of securities, broker control over the account, and intent to defraud the investor by obtaining unlawful commissions. A similar claim, excessive trading, under FINRA’s suitability rule involves just the first two elements.

Gana LLP Broker Spotlight: Pasquale “Pat” Vitucci Sales of Variable Annuities

April 27, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Pasquale “Pat” Vitucci (Vitucci) has been the subject of at least 19 customer complaints over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Vitucci alleging that the broker made unsuitable investments primarily in variable annuity related products. Other claims concerning Vitucci’s handling of customer accounts include allegations of misrepresentations, breach of fiduciary duty, churning, and fraud. In total investors have complained of over $1 million in losses.

Vitucci has been registered with FINRA since 1992. From October 2005 until October 2008, Vitucci was registered with AIG Financial Advisors, Inc. Thereafter, Vitucci has been associated with National Planning Corporation (National Planning). According to public records Vitucci operates out of a DBA business called Vitucci & Associates Insurance Services.

All advisers have a fundamental responsibility to deal fairly with investors including making suitable investment recommendations. Thus, the product or investment strategy being recommended must be appropriate for the investor and the advisers must convey the potential risks and rewards before bringing it to an investor’s attention.

Broker Investigation: Thomas Tedeschi’s Sales Practices

April 14, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Thomas Tedeschi (Tedeschi) has been the subject of at least 6 customer complaints, one judgment and lien over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Tedeschi alleging a litany of securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments, unauthorized trades, breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentations and false statements, and churning, among other claims. The claims involve different investment recommendations including claims involving warrants, penny stocks, and Exchange Traded Notes, among other speculative securities.

An examination of Tedeschi’s employment history reveals that Tedeschi moves from troubled firm to troubled firm. The pattern of brokers moving in this way is sometimes called “cockroaching” within the industry. See More Than 5,000 Stockbrokers From Expelled Firms Still Selling Securities, The Wall Street Journal, (Oct. 4, 2013). In Tedeschi’s 20 year career he has worked at 17 different firms.

Since 2008 alone Tedeschi has been registered with Westrock Advisors, Inc., Obsidian Financial Group, LLC, John Thomas Financial, Prestige Financial Center, Inc., Blackbook Capital LLC, and Aegis Capital Corp.

Broker Investigation: Salvatore Gioe’s Sales Practices

April 6, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Salvatore Gioe (Gioe) has been the subject of at least 11 customer complaints, one judgment and lien of over $197,000, and one regulatory action over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Gioe alleging a litany of securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments, unauthorized trades, breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentations and false statements, churning, margin fraud, among other claims. Many of the claims involve recommendations in penny stocks and other speculative securities.

Gioe was also suspended by the state of Arkansas for one year concerning allegation that in 2013, Gioe contacted an Arkansas resident through a cold call solicitation and recommended the purchase of Uni-Pixel, Inc. However, unfortunately for Gioe the cold caller turned out to be a securities examiner with the state of Arkansas. The examiner then sat and listed as Gioe allegedly told the examiner that he had information suggesting the price of Uni-Pixel would rise from its current price of $15.65 to about $25. The examiner asked Gioe if Uni-Pixel stock was a sure thing and Gioe allegedly responded saying that he did. However, according to Arkansas Uni-Pixel was a distressed company and this information was never disclosed to the examiner on the call.

An examination of Gioe’s employment history reveals that Gioe moves from troubled firm to troubled firm. The pattern of brokers moving in this way is sometimes called “cockroaching” within the industry. See More Than 5,000 Stockbrokers From Expelled Firms Still Selling Securities, The Wall Street Journal, (Oct. 4, 2013). In Gioe’s 14 year career he has worked at 13 different firms.

FINRA Files Complaint Against Broker Darnell Deans Over Undisclosed Tax Liens

March 23, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has filed a complaint against broker Darnell Deans (Deans) concerning allegations that while associated with Garden State Securities, Inc. (GSS), Deans willfully failed to amend his Form U4 documents to disclose three unsatisfied federal tax liens totaling approximately $254,995. FINRA also alleged that from in or about April 2011, through August 2011, Deans borrowed a total of $266,000 from two customers of the firm without seeking or obtaining the firm’s approval for the loans. In addition, FINRA alleged that in November 2011, Deans falsely represented to GSS in an Annual Attestation that he had not borrowed money from customers. Thereafter, in January 2012, FINRA alleged that Deans failed to disclose to GSS the extent of funds borrowed from two customers.

In January 1992, Deans first became registered with FINRA. From January 2005, through November 26, 2013, Deans was registered through GSS. On November 26, 2013, GSS filed a Form U5 terminating Deans’ registration stating that Deans was terminated due to management’s loss of confidence due to ongoing regulatory issues. Thereafter, Deans was associated with John Carris Investments LLC until June 2014. Currently, Deans is associated with brokerage firm BlackBook Capital LLC.

In addition to FINRA’s recent action, Deans has had three other regulatory actions filed against him, at least three customer complaints, and has one judgment and tax lien on record. These statistics are troubling because so many customer complaints, regulatory actions, and liens are rare. According to InvestmentNews, only about 12% of financial advisors have any type of disclosure event on their records. These disclosures do not necessarily have to include customer complaints but can include IRS tax liens, judgments, and even criminal matters. The number of brokers with multiple customer complaints is far smaller.

Gana LLP Broker Spotlight: Wade Lawrence

February 27, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the records kept by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Wade Lawrence (Lawrence) has been suspended following the broker’s failure to comply with an arbitration award or settlement and by failing to comply with the regulator’s request for information concerning compliance. In addition, FINRA permanently barred Lawrence for failing to respond to requests for information concerning allegations that he misappropriated funds from customers.

Lawrence first became registered with FINRA in 2002 with MML Investors Services, LLC. Thereafter, from June 2008 through July 2011, Lawrence was registered with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (Oppenheimer) Finally from August 4, 2011, until December 2013, Lawrence was registered with Southwest Securities, Inc. (Southwest). On December 12, 2013, Southwest filed a Form U5 that terminated Lawrence’s registration.

In addition to the FINRA regulatory actions Lawrence has been the subject of at least nine customer disputes. These statistics are troubling because multiple customer complaints on a broker’s record are rare. According to InvestmentNews, only about 12% of financial advisors have any type of disclosure event on their records. FINRA’s disclosure records do not just cover customer complaints but also include IRS tax liens, judgments, and even criminal matters. The number of brokers with multiple customer complaints is far smaller.

FINRA Sanctions Broker Douglas Campbell Jr. Over Unsuitable Investment Advice

February 26, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned broker Douglas Campbell Jr. (Campbell) concerning allegations that between May 2008 and September 2008, while registered with Wedbush Morgan Securities, Inc. (Wedbush), he engaged in unsuitable trading a customer’s account by recommending purchases of three speculative private placement investments that were not consistent with the customer’s investment objectives, resulting in an overconcentration in the customer’s account. FINRA found that Campbell’s recommendations were made without reasonable grounds for believing that they were suitable for the customer.

In addition, according to Campbell’s public records four customers have filed complaints concerning Campbell’s investment advice. These statistics are troubling because multiple customer complaints on a broker’s record are rare. According to InvestmentNews, only about 12% of financial advisors have any type of disclosure event on their records. These disclosures do not necessarily have to include customer complaints but can include IRS tax liens, judgments, and even criminal matters. The number of brokers with multiple customer complaints is far smaller. The complaints against Campbell alleged fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, excessive trading, and unsuitable investments.

Campbell first became registered with FINRA in 1994. On July 9, 2007, Campbell became registered Wedbush. On November 29, 2012, Wedbush filed a Form U5 reporting that Campbell voluntarily terminated his employment on November 26, 2012.

Why Wall Street Fights Against the Fiduciary Standard

October 30, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

In the wake of the financial crisis of 2008, the Dodd-Frank legislation authorized the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) to pass a fiduciary duty rule that would apply to brokers, as opposed to only financial advisors. Most investors do not realize and are usually shocked to learn that there broker only has an obligation to recommend “suitable” investments, and not to work in their client’s best interests. Currently, the fiduciary duty rule only applies to financial advisors (and brokers under certain circumstances) – more commonly recognized by the public as advisors who charge a flat fee for their services as opposed to commissions.

The fact that the investing public has absolutely no clue how crucial the fiduciary duty is to protecting their retirement futures and holding Wall Street accountable for mishaps has prevented any serious public debate to combat the millions of dollars the industry has and will spend to kill this part of the law. True to form, recently the House of Representatives passed a budget that would prevent the SEC from imposing a fiduciary standard on brokers during the upcoming federal fiscal year beginning in October.

What’s the big deal you may ask? Why is the fiduciary standard important to me? Well there are many reasons but maybe one story will highlight how the brokerage industry is currently allowed to operate to put their interests ahead of their clients. As recently reported in Bloomberg and InvestmentNews, an undercover U.S. Labor Department economist exposed how brokerage firms sought out federal workers to roll over their 401(k)’s with the government to IRAs with the brokerage firm even though the result could increase the client’s annual costs by as much as 50 times!