Securities Lawyers Blog

Advisor Anthony Conti Subject to Complaints Over Investment Suitability

September 24, 2019 | by Staff Attorney

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP is currently investigating advisor Anthony Conti (Conti), currently associated with Boenning & Scattergood, Inc. (Boenning & Scattergood) out of Carnegie, Pennsylvania. According to a BrokerCheck report, Conti has been subject to at least one customer dispute during the course of his career. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Conti’s customer complaints concern allegations of unsuitable investments.

In October 2016 it was alleged that Conti’s previous employer, Ross, Sinclaire & Associates, LLC (RSA), three clients of RSA commenced an arbitration claim against the firm. The clients alleged that RSA misrepresented the safety and security of film tax credit notes purchased from the issuer, leading clients to believe their principal was not subject to significant risk. The clients allege that these misrepresentations and negligence caused the loss of principal. The claim alleged $2,200,000 in damages. This dispute is currently still pending.

Michael Rappa Barred from the Securities Industry Over Private Securities Transactions

September 23, 2019 | by Staff Attorney

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP are currently investigating claims that advisor Michael Rappa (Rappa) engaged in undisclosed and unapproved private securities transactions. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Rappa, formerly registered with Foresters Equity Services, Inc. (Foresters Equity) out of San Diego, California was barred from the financial industry and disclosed at least two customer complaints. According to a BrokerCheck report, Rappa’s customer complaints allege that Rappa made unsuitable private securities transaction recommendations.

In February 2019, FINRA stated that Rappa consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that from August 2016 to July 2017, he engaged in undisclosed and unapproved private securities transactions totaling $2,731,287. The findings stated that Rappa solicited investors to purchase promissory notes relating to a purported real estate investment fund.

In May 2018, a customer alleged that in 2016, Rappa made unsuitable private securities transaction recommendations. The customer has requested $75,000 in damages. This dispute is currently still pending.

In February 2018, another customer similarly alleged that in 2017, Rappa was recommending unsuitable private securities transactions. The customer has requested $700,000 in damages. This dispute is currently still pending.

Richard Cagle Barred by Financial Regulatory Over Investment Violations

September 23, 2019 | by Staff Attorney

The attorneys at Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating BrokerCheck records reports that financial advisor Richard Cagle (Cagle), formerly employed by Hilltop Securities Independent Network Inc. (Hilltop Securities) has been subject to at least two customer complaints and one regulatory complaint resulting in a bar from the financial industry. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Cagle’s customer complaints allege that Cagle recommended unsuitable securities recommendations among other allegations of misconduct in the handling of customer accounts.

In July 2019 Cagle consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that he refused to appear and provide an on-the-record testimony requested by FINRA. FINRA stated that it commenced an investigation into whether Cagle violated FINRA rules by making unsuitable investment recommendations and mismarking customer order tickets while associated with his former member firm. Cagle’s failure to respond to the investigation drew an automatic bar from the industry.

Jeffrey Blutstein Barred From the Securities Industry Over Undisclosed Activity

September 22, 2019 | by Staff Attorney

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP are currently investigating claims that advisor Jeffrey Blutstein (Blutstein) engaged in undisclosed outside business activities (OBAs) that were not approved by his brokerage firm. Blutstein, formerly registered with American Portfolios Financial Services, Inc. (American Portfolios) and Kestra Investment Services, LLC (Kestra Investment) out of New York, was barred from the financial industry according to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). In addition, Blutstein disclosed one employment termination for cause and one criminal complaint.

In July 2019 FINRA found that Blutstein consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that he refused to provide documents and information requested by FINRA in connection with an investigation into whether he potentially violated FINRA rules by engaging in undisclosed outside business activities while associated with a member firm. Accordingly, Blutstein was automatically barred from the securities industry.

At this time it is unclear what OBA Blutstein engaged in that FINRA was investigating and whether or not that activity also involved private securities transactions. Blutstein’s public disclosures state that he was involved in a number of OBAs including Financial Logistics, an insurance business, among other businesses. It is unclear if these OBAs were the subject of FINRA’s investigation.

Brenda Smith and Broad Reach Capital Charged By SEC With Fraud – Investor Recovery Options

September 22, 2019 | by Staff Attorney

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP are currently investigating claims made by The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in which the agency charged a Pennsylvania investment adviser, Brenda Smith (Smith) with operating an investment advisory fraud involving over $100 million in investments. In conjunction with the SEC action the regulatory obtained an emergency asset freeze in order to preserve investor funds.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Brenda Smith, and her fund Broad Reach Capital, LP, (Broad Reach Capital) raised $105 million from approximately 40 investors by representing that she would invest their money in publicly traded securities through various trading strategies that were promoted as providing consistent high returns. The SEC found that Smith instead made very few investments in these trading strategies and largely used investors’ money to repay other investors and for her own personal investments. The SEC alleged that Smith through entities she controlled disseminated false statements in order to tout positive returns and fabricated documents in an attempt to inflate Broad Reach Capital’s assets in order to lull investors into believing their capital was safe.

The SEC’s complaint charges Smith, Broad Reach Capital, the fund’s general partner Broad Reach Partners, LLC, and the adviser, Bristol Advisors, LLC with violating the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws.

Ross Sinclaire & Associates Sanctioned Over Private Placement Practices

September 21, 2019 | by Staff Attorney

According to BrokerCheck records Ross Sinclaire & Associates, LLC (Ross Sinclaire) has been subject to a regulatory action over, among other things, the firm’s sales practices with respect to several private placement offerings. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Ross Sinclaire has been accused by FINRA of failing to disclose material information to investors in relation to several offerings offerings.

FINRA alleged that in March and April 2014, Ross Sinclaire was the exclusive placement agent for a private placement of notes and was involved in the preparation and circulation of a Confidential Information Memorandum (CIM) to seven accredited investors for notes. The proceeds were to provide to a film production company for the advance funding of anticipated state tax credits. The CIM disclosed that in addition to a 2% commission, Ross Sinclaire would also earn a “certain percentage” of profits on the sale of tax credits but failed to disclose that it would earn half of those profits. FINRA found that this information was a material fact that would have been important to investors. FINRA also found that the CIM also failed to disclose that one of Ross Sinclaire’s registered representatives was Vice President or the issuer.

In another offering, FINRA alleged that between December 2015 and December 2016, Ross Sinclaire omitted material facts from the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) for municipal bonds underwritten by the Firm to finance the construction of a community recreation center. FINRA found that Ross Sinclaire failed to disclose in the PPM: (i) that the issuer had threatened to default on an earlier series of bonds and bond anticipation notes (BANs); (ii) that a loan agreement existed between the issuer and Ross Sinclaire: and (iii) information about the finances of both the issuer and Ross Sinclaire. FINRA determined that this information should have been included in the PPM as it would have been material to investors in deciding whether to invest in the bonds.

Andre Davis Accused by Multiple Clients of Churning Their Accounts

September 21, 2019 | by Staff Attorney

According to BrokerCheck records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Andre Davis (Davis), currently associated with Paulson Investment Company LLC (Paulson Investment), has been subject to at least 15 customer complaints and two criminal matters during his career. The majority of the customer complaints against Davis concern allegations of high frequency trading activity also referred to as churning.

In August 2019 a customer complained that Davis made unsuitable investment recommendations, excessive trading, and unauthorized trading. The claim alleges $350,000 in damages and is currently pending.

In June 2019 a customer complained that Davis churned their account and made unauthorized trades. The claim alleges $152,400 in damages and is currently pending.

In May 2019 a customer complained that Davis violated the securities laws by excessive trading, unauthorized trades, and unsuitable investments. The claim alleges $461,000 in damages and is currently pending.

In April 2019 a customer complained that Davis violated the securities laws by excessive trading and unauthorized trades. The claim alleges $300,000 in damages and is currently pending.

When brokers engage in excessive trading, sometimes referred to as churning, the broker will typical trade in and out of securities, sometimes even the same stock, many times over a short period of time. Often times the account will completely “turnover” every month with different securities. This type of investment trading activity in the client’s account serves no reasonable purpose for the investor and is engaged in only to profit the broker through the generation of commissions created by the trades. Churning is considered a species of securities fraud. The elements of the claim are excessive transactions of securities, broker control over the account, and intent to defraud the investor by obtaining unlawful commissions. A similar claim, excessive trading, under FINRA’s suitability rule involves just the first two elements. Certain commonly used measures and ratios used to determine churning help evaluate a churning claim. These ratios look at how frequently the account is turned over plus whether or not the expenses incurred in the account made it unreasonable that the investor could reasonably profit from the activity.

Broker Rick Konecny Has Several Suitability Complaints

September 20, 2019 | by Staff Attorney

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP are currently investigating claims that advisor Rick Konecny (Konecny) engaged in violations of the securities laws. Konecny, formerly registered with National Securities Corporation (National Securities) and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JP Morgan) out of Chicago, Illinois was barred from the financial industry according to a BrokerCheck report. In addition, Konecny has been subject to at least eleven customer complaints, three regulatory actions, and one termination for cause during his career. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), many of the complaints against Konecny concern allegations of unsuitable investments.

In March 2016, Konecny was terminated J.P. Morgan Securities LLC over allegations of his failure to escalate client matters and failed to follow requirements with respect to execution of trades on a discretionary basis.

In April 2018, a customer alleged that from 2008 to 2013, Konecny’s recommendation of high-risk mining and metal equities was unsuitable to the customer’s investment needs. The customer requested $1,210,380 in damages.

In January 2018, a customer alleged that from July 2013 to October 2015, Konecny invested the account in an unsuitable and over concentrated manner causing $81,856.00 in damages. The claim settled for $2,768.

Former Broker Paul Soll Barred from the Securities Industry

September 20, 2019 | by Staff Attorney

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP are currently investigating advisor Paul Soll (Soll), formerly registered with Western International Securities, Inc. (Western International) and Financial West Group (FWG) out of Los Angeles, California. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Soll was barred from the financial industry for failing to provide the regulator with information about his trading activities that concern possible excessive trading a securities law violation that is similar to churning. According to a BrokerCheck report, Soll also disclosed at least one customer complaint alleging breach of fiduciary duty.

In July 2018, FINRA stated that Soll violated FINRA Rules 8210 and 2010 by failing to provide the regulator with information about his potential trading abuses. Soll was thereby barred from the securities industry.

Moreover, a customer filed a complaint alleging that Soll engaged in breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and misrepresentation in the sale of bonds. The amount of damages was not specified. The claim settled for $660,574.

SagePoint Advisor Paul Mauro Subject to Multiple Investment Complaints

September 18, 2019 | by Staff Attorney

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating broker Paul Mauro (Mauro), currently associated with SagePoint Financial, Inc. (SagePoint Financial) out of Westborough, Massachusetts. According to a BrokerCheck report, Mauro has been subject to at least nine customer disputes, two regulatory actions, and one criminal matter during the course of his career. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the customer complaints against Mauro concern allegations of unsuitable investment recommendations and misrepresentations.

In February 2018, as a result of Mauro’s disclosure incidents, the State of Massachusetts Securities Division placed conditions on Mauro’s registrations in Massachusetts and required him to be placed under heightened supervision by his brokerage firm.

In December 2018 a customer alleged that in 2017 Mauro unsuitably purchased variable annuity causing $6,630 in damages. The claim was denied.

In June 2017 a customer filed a complaint alleging that Mauro made unsuitable recommendations causing $86,000 in damages. The claim was denied.