Securities Lawyers Blog

FINRA Fines Brokerage Firm Over Misleading Variable Annuities Disclosures and Failure to Supervise

October 12, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) fined brokerage firm Financial West Investment Group, Inc. d/b/a Financial West Group (Financial West Group) over allegations between March 2009 and May 2010, the firm did not provide accurate variable annuity disclosures to customers concerning certain fees and charges. FINRA also alleged that Financial West Group failed to have an adequate written supervisory procedure to ensure that customers received accurate disclosures about these fees and charges. Finally, FINRA alleged that Financial West Group did not adequately enforce its policies for reviewing emails. In resolving these allegations Financial West Group paid a $35,000 fine.

Financial West Group’s main offices are in Westlake Village, California. The firm has approximately 116 registered branch offices and employs 290 registered brokers.

FINRA alleged that between March 2009, and May 2010, the Financial West Group used forms called variable annuity disclosure and investment form, request to switch investments form, and the product comparison worksheet to inform customers of various features of deferred variable annuities. The forms included information concerning the potential surrender period and surrender charge, potential tax penalty if customers sell or redeem deferred variable annuities before reaching the age of 59 1/2, mortality and expense fees, the potential charges for and features of riders, the investment options, death benefits, payment options, and risks disclosures. However, according to FINRA, Financial West Group did not provide accurate disclosures to customers in 28 out of 93 (30%) of the variable annuity transactions and exchanges reviewed by the regulator.

FINRA Files Amended Complaint Against John Carris Investment LLC for Stock Manipulation and Unsuitable Offerings

October 10, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

On September 30, 2013, FINRA filed an amended complaint against John Carris Investments LLC (JCI), its founder George Carris and others. In the complaint, FINRA alleges JCI engaged in: stock manipulation, unsuitable self-offerings of securities, operating a securities business without sufficient net capital, use of firm funds to pay the expenses of principal officers at JCI, providing false tax documents, and failing to pay payroll taxes.

JCI is a Wall Street Investment Bank and wholly-owned subsidiary of Invictus Capital, Inc. (Invictus). In 2009, Carris formed JCI. Carris has served as JCI’s CEO, President, and Managing Director of Investment Banking since its inception. Shortly after forming JCI, Carris formed Invictus and transferred complete ownership of JCI to Invictus.

FINRA alleges that from May 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010, JCI’s head trader Jason Barter engaged in manipulative trading of Fibrocell Science, Inc. (Fibrocell), a biotechnology company specializing in skin and tissue rejuvenation. During that period, JCI acted as a placement agent for Fibrocell and sold shares of Fibrocell through unregistered PIPE deals. A PIPE deal is a private investment in public equity, which companies pursue when capital markets cannot provide financing and traditional alternatives do not exist for that issuer.

FINRA Suspends Broker Anthony Mediate for 60 Days Over Allegations of Excessive Trading (Churning) and Unauthorized Trading

October 9, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) suspended broker Anthony Mediate (Mediate) for 60 days concerning allegations of excessive trading (churning) and unauthorized trading. “Churning” is excessive investment trading activity that serves little useful purpose or is inconsistent with the investor’s objectives and is conducted solely to generate commissions for the broker. Churning is also a type of securities fraud.

FINRA alleged that Mediate violated NASD Rules 2110 and 2310. NASD Rule 2310(a) provides that when recommending the purchase, sale, or exchange of any security a broker “shall have reasonable grounds for believing that the recommendation is suitable for such customer…” A broker’s recommendations must “be consistent with his customer’s best interests.” NASD IM-2310-2(a)(1) also require that the broker must “’have reasonable grounds to believe that the number of recommended transactions within a particular period is not excessive.” NASD IM-2310-2(b)(2) prohibits brokers from excessively trading in customer accounts.

An excessive trading violation occurs when: 1) a broker has control over the account and the trading in the account, and 2) the level of activity in that account is inconsistent with the customer’s objectives and financial situation. Where an intent to defraud or reckless disregard for the customer’s interests is present the activity is also churning.

Gana LLP Investigates UBS Puerto Rico, Popular Securities, and Santander Securities Sales of Puerto Rican Bond Funds

October 8, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The steep decline in prices of Puerto Rican bonds has caused local investors substantial investment losses in assets that many are claiming were sold to them as safe and secure bonds. According to a New York Times article, Puerto Rico’s woes stem from the fact that its 3.7 million residents have approximately $87 billion of debt outstanding (about $23,000 of debt for every man, woman, and child) and spiraling pension costs. Further, Puerto Rico has experienced a rapidly declining population and double-digit unemployment causing the debt to be left behind to a smaller and poorer population to shoulder the debt burden.

Bond losses have been so great that Puerto Rico has been effectively shut out of the bond market and is now financing its operations with bank credit and other short-term measures that are unsustainable. The commonwealth’s bonds are widely held by local mutual funds issued by Puerto Rico’s largest brokerage firms including UBS Puerto Rico, Popular Securities, Inc., and Santander Securities, Corp. If the situation continues to worsen some fear that Puerto Rico will need some sort of federal action and bailout, an action without precedent.

Investor loss estimate tied to the bond fund sell-off have reached hundreds of millions of dollars. However, an accurate tally of the total damages is impossible at this time. Some investors have begun filing claims against their brokerage firm claiming that the losses have substantially or completely wiped out their retirement savings. These investors have claimed that their brokerage firm sold the bond funds as safe, stable, income producing investments. However, the bond funds not only had concentrated credit risk in Puerto Rican securities but also, in the case of the UBS leveraged funds, employed leverage of over 53%, exacerbating the losses. Comparatively, municipal bond funds domiciled in the United States are allowed to use only about half as much leverage as employed by the UBS funds.

FINRA Bars Broker Over Allegations of Churning (Excessive Trading) and Unauthorized Trading in Customer Accounts

October 7, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has barred Chad David Kelly (Kelly) concerning allegations of churning (excessive trading) and unauthorized trading. “Churning” is excessive investment trading activity that serves little useful purpose or is inconsistent with the investor’s objectives and is conducted solely to generate commissions for the broker. Churning is also a type of securities fraud.

FINRA alleged that Kelly willfully violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act of 1934”), Rule 10b-5, and violated FINRA Rules 2020, and 2010, NASD Rules 2120, 2110, 2310, and IM-2310(a) and (b).

According to FINRA, excessive trading violation occurs when: 1) a broker has control over the account and the trading in the account, and 2) the level of activity in that account is inconsistent with the customer’s objectives and financial situation. Where an intent to defraud or reckless disregard for the customer’s interests is present the activity is also churning. Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 prohibits the use of “any manipulative or deceptive act or practice” in connection with the purchase or sale of a security and Rule 10b-5 prohibits “any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud.” NASD Rule 2310(a) provides that when recommending the purchase, sale, or exchange of any security a broker “shall have reasonable grounds for believing that the recommendation is suitable for such customer…” A broker’s recommendations must “be consistent with his customer’s best interests.” NASD IM-2310-2(a)(1) also require that the broker must “’have reasonable grounds to believe that the number of recommended transactions within a particular period is not excessive.” NASD IM-2310-2(b)(2) prohibits brokers from excessively trading in customer accounts.

Former Waddell & Reed and Merrill Lynch Stockbroker Fined and Suspended for Misconduct

October 6, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

FINRA has fined Maryland financial adviser and investment counselor Jill Meredith Carr $10,000 and suspended her for two years from the securities industry. According to the letter of acceptance, waiver and consent (“AWC”) submitted by Ms. Carr, she entered the securities industry in 2007 with Merrill Lynch until her termination for “failure to meet performance standards” in 2008. She then worked for Waddell & Reed, Inc until her termination in July 2012 when she was terminated for forging customer signatures. Brokers and investment advisers the forge customer signatures constitute a form of securities fraud.

According to the AWC, from December 2011 through June 2012, Carr forged signatures of at least 15 Waddell & Reed customers on at least 24 forms. Carr also altered information on other account forms after the forms were signed by the customers. Specifically, in connection with firm-required suitability updates, Carr forged the signatures of at least six customers on at least 12 update forms without their knowledge, consent, or authorization. In addition, she forged at least five additional signatures, allegedly as an accommodation to those customers. By forging the signatures, FINRA found that Carr violated FINRA Rule 2010. Finra Rule 2010 states that “A member, in the conduct of its business, shall observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade.”

Pursuant to FINRA Rules, brokerage firms rely on customers’ stated objectives and profiles to determine whether the investment objectives and the broker recommendations are consistent. It is important that investors and their brokers fully understand these objectives. It is imperative that these objectives be properly stated. Here, FINRA’s fine and suspension reflects the importance of these documents.

Announcement: David I. Wax Joins Gana LLP

October 4, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Gana Weinstein LLP is pleased to announce that it has added David I. Wax as of counsel to the firm. Mr. Wax brings to the firm significant experience managing complex commercial litigation matters from inception and discovery through motion practice and trial. Mr. Wax has represented a variety of clients over the course of his career, from individual investors to large financial institutions. Mr. Wax’s current practice focuses on providing outside general counsel services to rapidly growing small businesses as well as general litigation. By adding Mr. Wax as of Counsel, Gana Weinstein LLP has strengthens its core securities arbitration & litigation practice and diversifies its practice.

Retired Auto Executive Sues UBS for $30 Million for Investment Fraud Related to Puerto Rican Bonds

October 3, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

On October 1, 2013, Victor Gómez, Jr. a retired auto executive filed an action against UBS for investment fraud related to Puerto Rican bonds. According to the Caribbean News, this is the first of many legal actions expected to be filed in FINRA against UBS Financial Services, Inc. Mr. Gómez and his family are seeking $30 million in restitution for their investment losses, attorneys’ fees, punitive damages, and other costs. Gómez and his family claim that UBS designed an unsuitable investment strategy, never properly disclosed the risks, and implemented an “illicit and fraudulent scheme perpetrated to generate exorbitant profits… in utter disregard of the best interests of claimants, public interest and applicable laws and regulations.”

According to the Caribbean News, the statement of claim names: “UBS Financial Services Inc.; UBS Bank USA; UBS financial consultants and investment executives José M. Ramirez and Carlos Freire Borges; UBS senior officer Doel García; UBS Puerto Rico CEO Carlos Ubiñas; and other unidentified UBS officials.”

According to sources, the funds at issue were:

Adam Gana Selected to the National Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers

October 1, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Adam Gana is selected to the National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers. The attorneys selected for this prodigious honor are selected by invitation-only and is composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state in the nation who meet detailed and mandatory qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a multi-phase process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research. Membership is extended only to the select few of the most qualified attorneys from each state who demonstrate superior qualifications of leadership, reputation, influence, stature and public profile.

According to the National Trial Lawyers each member of the top 100 members posses the knowledge, skill, experience and success held by the finest and best attorneys in America. The National Trial Lawyers is devoted to protecting and preserving justice for all. Through networking and legal seminars, The National Trial Lawyers provides a competitive edge to attorneys already at the top of their field. To learn more about Mr. Gana’s nomination please visit:

http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Adam/Gana/4471/

Larry Dearman and Others charged by the SEC for Fraud

September 30, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Larry J. Dearman (Dearman), Sr. Marya Gray (Gray), Bartnet Wireless Internet Inc., The Property Shoppe, Inc., and Quench Buds Holding Company LLC. Dearman and Gray allegedly created an illegal scheme that fraudulently raised at least $4.7 million from thirty (30) of Deaman’s advisory clients. Dearman promised the clients that their money would be invested into lucrative investments. However, according to the SEC, Dearman and Gray squandered the funds by gambling, paying for personal expenses, and making payments to other businesses controlled by Gray.

Dearman is currently not registered as a broker with FINRA; however Dearman was registered with various brokerage firms from 2005 until 2012. From April 2002 until February 2005 Dearman was registered with the firm AXA Advisors, LLC. Upon leaving AXA Advisors, Dearman joined Brecek & Young Advisors, Inc. until January 2009. From January 2009 until February 2010 Dearman joined Securities America, Inc. Finally, Dearman was a broker with Cambridge Legacy Securities LLC from February 2010 until May 2012.

The SEC Complaint explains between December 2008 and August 2012 Dearman raised $1.7 million through the sale of promissory notes for Bartnet, a wireless internet service, whose majority shareholder was Gray. In addition, Dearman raised $2 million for a second Gray-controlled company, the Property Shoppe. Finally, in 2012 Dearman recommended his clients invest in Quench Buds, four convenient stores owned by Gray. Instead of investing the capital raised, Dearman and Gray allegedly allocated the funds to personal gambling expenses and payments to investors in the ponzi scheme.