Securities Lawyers Blog

Customers File Churning Complaints Against Legend Securities Broker Daren Dorval

October 14, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Daren Dorval (Dorval) has been the subject of at least 6 customer complaints, 1 regulatory matter, and one criminal matter over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Dorval alleging securities law violations that focus primarily on churning and excessive trading. In addition to the churning claims, customers have complained of unsuitable investments, negligence, fraud, unauthorized trading, and misrepresentations, among other claims.

According to a 2010 FINRA finding, the regulator alleged that Dorval engaged in unauthorized discretionary trading in a customer account by entering trades based upon the orders of a person related to the customer without appropriate written trading authority.

Dorval entered the securities industry in 2001. From January 2002, until September 2009, Dorval was associated with vFinance Investments, Inc. Thereafter, Dorval became associated with Legend Securities, Inc where he remains registered.

FINRA Files Complaint Against Former Woodstock Financial Group Broker David Wolk

October 13, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker David Wolk (Wolk) has been the subject of an astonishing 13 customer complaints, 3 regulatory matters, one criminal matter, and 6 judgments and liens over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Wolk alleging securities law violations that focus on churning and excessive trading. In addition to the churning claims, customers have complained of unsuitable investments, negligence, fraud, unauthorized trading, and misrepresentations, among other claims. In total the customer complaints allege several million dollars in damages.

The latest FINRA complaint (Disciplinary Proceeding No. 2012033981601) alleges that from November 2003, through January 2014, while Wolk was associated with Woodstock Financial Group, Inc. (Woodstock), Wolk was subject to six tax liens totaling over $810,000 and a state tax levy for $106,871.02. FINRA alleges that Respondent willfully failed to timely update his Form U4 to disclose these matters within FINRA’s 30-day reporting deadline. In addition, FINRA alleged that Respondent made a false attestation to Woodstock on an annual compliance questionnaire failing to disclose the liens. The latest FINRA complaint is only one of three total FINRA complaints. In October 2014, Wolk faied to pay fines associated with another FINRA matter. In August 2014, Wolk consented to FINRA’s findings that he attempted to settle a customer complaint without notifying his firm.

Wolk entered the securities industry in 1998. From February 2003 until September 2014, Wolk was associated with Woodstock out of the firm’s Garden City, New York office.

Customers File Dozens of Complaints Against Former Oppenheimer Broker Bennett Broad

October 13, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Bennett Broad (Broad) has been the subject of an astonishing 28 customer complaints and one regulatory matter over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Broad alleging securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments, negligence, unauthorized trading, misrepresentations, and churning and excessive trading, among other claims. In total the customer complaints allege several million dollars in damages. In May 2015, FINRA sought to investigate Broad and his activities and requested that the broker provide the regulator with information. Broad failed to respond to FINRA’s requests and was consequently subject to an automatic bar from the industry. The details of FINRA’s requests and investigation is not available at this time.

Broad entered the securities industry in 1979. From March 2003 until April 2015, Broad was associated with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. out of the firm’s Jenkintown, Pennsylvania office.

All advisers have a fundamental responsibility to deal fairly with investors including making suitable investment recommendations. In order to make suitable recommendations the broker must have a reasonable basis for recommending the product or security based upon the broker’s investigation of the investments properties including its benefits, risks, tax consequences, and other relevant factors. In addition, the broker must also understand the customer’s specific investment objectives to determine whether or not the specific product or security being recommended is appropriate for the customer based upon their needs.

Broker Spotlight: Ameriprise Financial Broker Michael Lipscomb

October 12, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Michael Lipscomb (Lipscomb) has been the subject of at least four customer complaints and two criminal matters over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Lipscomb alleging securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments, negligence, unauthorized trading, and excessive trading among other claims.

Lipscomb entered the securities industry in 1992. From March 2007 until August 2014, Lipscomb was associated with Wunderlich Securities, Inc. Lipscomb is currently registered with Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. out of the firm’s Orlando, Florida office.

All advisers have a fundamental responsibility to deal fairly with investors including making suitable investment recommendations. In order to make suitable recommendations the broker must have a reasonable basis for recommending the product or security based upon the broker’s investigation of the investments properties including its benefits, risks, tax consequences, and other relevant factors. In addition, the broker must also understand the customer’s specific investment objectives to determine whether or not the specific product or security being recommended is appropriate for the customer based upon their needs.

Customers File Complaints Against Francis Velten Over Variable Annuity Practices

October 12, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Francis Velten (Velten) has been the subject of at least eight customer complaints and one regulatory investigation over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Velten alleging securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments relating primarily to the sale of variable annuities.

Velten entered the securities industry in 1993. Since August 2006, Velten has been a registered representative of Summit Brokerage Services, Inc. out of the firm’s New Port Richey, Florida office location.

As a background, variable annuities are complex products that combine aspects of investing and insurance. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has released a publication entitled: Variable Annuities: What You Should Know encouraging investors to ask questions about the variable annuity before investing. Essentially, a variable annuity is a contract with an insurance company under which the insurer agrees to make periodic payments to you. The investor chooses the investments made in the annuity and value of your variable annuity will vary depending on the performance of the investment options chosen. The primary benefits of variable annuities are the death benefit and tax deferment of investment gains.

Hedge Fund Canarsie Capital Losses 99.7% of Client’s Money Leading to SEC Investigation

October 10, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to news sources, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are investigating how the hedge fund Canarsie Capital lost nearly all of the $60 million capital in just three weeks of trading. The fund was run by Owen Li (Li), and Ken deRegt (deRegt). Canarsie Capital was named for the Brooklyn neighborhood where Li grew up and was launched in January 2013 and had offices in midtown Manhattan, New York. Li previously worked for Raj Rajaratnam’s (Rajaratnam) Galleon Group. Rajaratnam is currently serving an 11 year sentence following his May 2011 conviction on nine counts of securities fraud and five counts of conspiracy. The claims against him relate to $63.8 million in illicit profit from 2003 to 2009 by trading in stocks such as eBay Inc, Goldman Sachs Group Inc and Google Inc. Li cofounded the Canarsie Capital with his former Stanford University roommate, Eric deRegt and Eric’s father who ran Morgan Stanley’s fixed-income business.

According to filings the minimum investment accepted from an outside investor in the fund was $1 million. At its peak, Canarsie Capital had managed around $98 million in assets and had some well-known contributors. Goldman Sachs was the fund’s prime broker and clears and settles trades for the hedge fund starting in the fall of 2014. The Goldman Sachs switch came after the fund was dropped in March 2014, by Morgan Stanley’s prime brokerage over concerns with the fund’s risk practices.

On January 20, 2015, Li, wrote an apology letter to investors telling them that he “engaged in a series of aggressive transactions” during the first three weeks of 2015 that resulted in losing all but $200,000 of the fund’s capital, a 99.7% loss. According to the letter, Li engaged in aggressive trading in an attempt to recuperate prior losses the fund suffered in the fund in December 2014. At this time it’s unclear what the trading strategy was that Li engaged in January of this year. The only details in the letter concerning the securities themselves are that they included “options with strike prices pegged to the broader market increasing in value” and “some direct positions.”

SEC Accuses Dawn Bennett of Misleading Investors On Her Radio Program

October 9, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Dawn Bennett (Bennett) has been the subject of at least six customer complaints over the course of her career. Customers have filed complaints against Bennett alleging securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, misrepresentations, and excessive trading among other claims. In addition to customer complaints, The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a press release announcing fraud charges against Bennett, a Maryland-based financial services firm and founder/CEO, accusing her of grossly inflating the amount of managed assets and exaggerating the investment returns actually obtained for customers.

Bennett entered the securities industry in 1987. From 2006, until October 2009, Bennett was associated with Royal Alliance Associates, Inc. Thereafter, from October 2009, till present Bennett is associated with Western International Securities, Inc.

The SEC’s allegations relate to Bennett’s attempts to inflate the firm’s profile and prestige by overhyping assets under management and customer returns. The SEC alleged that Bennett frequently touted to customers and on her paid radio program that highly profitable investment returns generated by Bennett Group Financial Services placed the firm in the top 1 percent of firms worldwide. However, the SEC charged that Bennett failed to disclose that the returns were calculated for a model portfolio and not based on actual investor performance. The SEC further alleged that Bennett and her firm claimed to be managing more than $2 billion in assets when in reality Bennett managed no more than one-fifth of that amount.

Customers File Claims Against Broker David Page

October 9, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker David Page (Page) has been the subject of at least three customer complaints over the course of his career. Customers have filed complaints against Page alleging securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, unauthorized trading, misrepresentations, and failure to follow instructions among other claims.

An examination of Page’s employment history reveals that the broker moves from troubled firm to troubled firm. The pattern of brokers moving in this way is sometimes called “cockroaching” within the industry. See More Than 5,000 Stockbrokers From Expelled Firms Still Selling Securities, The Wall Street Journal, (Oct. 4, 2013). In Page’s 18 year career he has worked at eight different firms. Since May 2005 until April 2008, Page was associated with Investors Capital Corp. Thereafter, from April 2008, until May 2013, Page was a registered representative with John Thomas Financial. From May 2013, until March 2015, Page was associated with Brookville Capital Partners. After that Page was associated for only one month with Tryco Securities, Inc. Finally, Page is currently registered with Legend Securities, Inc.

Several the firms Page has been associated with have been expelled by FINRA including John Thomas Financial which was run by Anastasios “Tommy” Belesis who recently agreed to be banned from the securities industry when the SEC accused him of defrauding investors in two hedge funds. In addition, John Thomas faced allegations of penny-stock fraud by FINRA after the firm reaped more than $100 million in commissions over its six-year history before it closed in July. According to new sources trainees at the firm earned as little as $300 a week to pitch stocks with memorized scripts.

FINRA Suspends Former LPL Financial Broker Walter Chao Over Private Securities Transactions

October 8, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned and suspended for two year broker Walter Chao (Chao) (FINRA No. 2012034046301) alleging that between February and May 2012, while registered with LPL Financial LLC (LPL Financial), Chao participated in nine private securities transactions totaling $1.27 million without LPL’s approval. According to FINRA, Chao attempted to conceal his participation in the private securities transactions by using an unapproved email address and providing false and misleading answers in a compliance questionnaire. In addition, FINRA claimed that Chao also provided false and misleading statements to FINRA regarding his involvement in the private securities transactions. In addition, FINRA found that Chao was also a branch manager and failed to adequately supervise certain conduct such as being aware that staff under his supervision were using blank signed forms and unapproved email addresses.

Chao entered the securities industry in June 2003. In August 2007, Chao joined LPL Financial. LPL Financial terminated Chao’s registration in September 2012 for violating firm policies and procedures relative to participation in private securities transactions away from the firm without firm authorization. From October 2012 to January 2015, Chao was registered with Purshe Kaplan Sterling Investments.

FINRA alleged that in late 2011, Chao learned that a firm had created a special purpose vehicle (SPV) to purchase pre-initial public offering (IPO) shares of Facebook. By using the SPV investors could purchase ownership interests in the SPV in order to participate in the Facebook IPO. FINRA found that Chao wanted to solicit his customers to purchase interests in the Facebook SPV but knew that he was required to get approval from LPL Financial before doing so. Chao requested approval but LPL Financial denied his request.

Former National Securities Corporation Broker Brian Folland Subject to Numerous Customers Complaints

October 8, 2015 | by Staff Attorney

According to the BrokerCheck records kept by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Brian Folland (Folland) has been hit with at least 30 customer complaints over his career and two tax liens. Customers have filed complaints against Folland alleging securities law violations including that the broker made unsuitable investments, negligence, misrepresentations, breach of fiduciary duty, violation of blue sky statutes in several states, and fraud among other claims. The claims against Folland involve various types of securities including private placements, direct participation programs and limited partnerships which include investments like oil & gas, non-traded real estate investment trusts (Non-Traded REITs), equipment leasing programs. In addition, in July 2012, Folland disclosed a tax lien of $334,995 owed. Tax liens of that size provide an incentive and conflict of interest in the recommendation of high commission based products such as private placements and direct participation programs that often pay commission between 7-10%.

Folland entered the securities industry in 1995. From July 2007 until May 2013, Folland was associated with brokerage firm National Securities Corporation (National Securities) out of the firm’s Fresno, California office location.

All advisers have a fundamental responsibility to deal fairly with investors including making suitable investment recommendations. In order to make suitable recommendations the broker must have a reasonable basis for recommending the product or security based upon the broker’s investigation of the investments properties including its benefits, risks, tax consequences, and other relevant factors. In addition, the broker must also understand the customer’s specific investment objectives to determine whether or not the specific product or security being recommended is appropriate for the customer based upon their needs.