Private Placements

FINRA Files Amended Complaint Against John Carris Investment LLC for Stock Manipulation and Unsuitable Offerings

October 10, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

On September 30, 2013, FINRA filed an amended complaint against John Carris Investments LLC (JCI), its founder George Carris and others. In the complaint, FINRA alleges JCI engaged in: stock manipulation, unsuitable self-offerings of securities, operating a securities business without sufficient net capital, use of firm funds to pay the expenses of principal officers at JCI, providing false tax documents, and failing to pay payroll taxes.

JCI is a Wall Street Investment Bank and wholly-owned subsidiary of Invictus Capital, Inc. (Invictus). In 2009, Carris formed JCI. Carris has served as JCI’s CEO, President, and Managing Director of Investment Banking since its inception. Shortly after forming JCI, Carris formed Invictus and transferred complete ownership of JCI to Invictus.

FINRA alleges that from May 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010, JCI’s head trader Jason Barter engaged in manipulative trading of Fibrocell Science, Inc. (Fibrocell), a biotechnology company specializing in skin and tissue rejuvenation. During that period, JCI acted as a placement agent for Fibrocell and sold shares of Fibrocell through unregistered PIPE deals. A PIPE deal is a private investment in public equity, which companies pursue when capital markets cannot provide financing and traditional alternatives do not exist for that issuer.

Conrad Bautista Barred From Financial Industry for Alleged Private Placements Sales

September 23, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Conrad Tambalo Bautista (Bautista) resolved charges brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) concerning the sale of private securities and possible involvement in a fraudulent investment scheme by accepting a bar from the securities industry.

Bautista has been associated with seven FINRA member firms including his most recent employer, CUSO Financial Services, L.P. (CUSO) from January 2010 to March 2013. Prior to CUSO, Bautista was associated with SWBC Investment Services, LLC, Financial Network Investment Corporation, and Wells Fargo Investments, LLC. Bautista obtained Series 6, 7, and 63 securities licenses.

Bautista’s public records do not disclose any businesses, other than CUSO, that Bautista was involved in. However, in February 2013, a customer allegedly filed a complaint against Bautista involving potential securities related misconduct. Subsequently, FINRA sent Bautista requests for information concerning the substance of the customer complaint. The FINRA letter sought information into whether Bautista may have engaged in fraudulent investment schemes. In addition, FINRA had information that suggested that Bautista may have been involved in undisclosed outside business activities and private securities transactions that may have involved borrowing money from customers.

VSR Financial Services, Inc. and Donald J. Beary Fined Over Alternative Investment Sales

September 23, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), VSR Financial Services, Inc. (“VSR”), and Donald J. Beary (“Beary”) have reached a settlement concerning charges brought by the securities regulator that VSR violated customer concentration guidelines and otherwise failed to reasonably supervise its brokers in the sales of alternative investments. The settlement led to VSR paying a $550,000 fine and Beary being suspended from associating with a FINRA firm for 45 days and a $10,000 fine.

VSR is based in Overland Park, Kansas, has 211 branch offices, and employs approximately 460 registered personnel. Beary is a co-founder of VSR and is its executive vice-president, chairman of the board, and direct participation principal.

According to FINRA, from 2005 until 2010 VSR and Beary failed to adequately implement the firm’s supervisory procedures concerning concentration limits in customer accounts for alternative investments. The settlement details that VSR’s supervisory failures regarding concentration limits occurred because the firm used inaccurate statements reflecting the customer’s true concentration in alternative investments and because the firm used inaccurate risk ratings of products to increase allowable concentration levels.

Private Placements – FINRA Warns Evaluate the Risks Before Investing

September 21, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Every year, companies across the United States raise hundreds of billions of dollars selling securities in non-public offerings that are exempt from registration under the federal securities laws. These offerings, known as private placements, can be a tremendous source of capital for both small and large business. However, according to FINRA, investors should be aware that private placements can be illiquid and are very risky with the potential to lose most or all of your investment.

Fraud and Sales Practices Abuses

For over three years, FINRA has been investigating private placements and has uncovered fraud and sales practice abuses related to private placements that resulted in sanctions of individual brokers and financial institutions for providing investors inaccurate information relating to private placements. In addition, some materials omitted information necessary for investors to make informed investment decisions. Finally some firms failed to conduct adequate investigations into whether the private placements were suitable for customers.

SEC Approves Advertising for Private Placements

September 20, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

In a 4-1 vote, the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) approved a rule that would now allow broker-dealers, hedge funds, and private equity firms to advertise to the general public for private placement securities offerings. Firms are still limited to sales to accredited investors. Accredited investors are defined as those who have a net worth of $1 million, excluding the value of the investors primary residence, or earning at least $200,000 annually. According to Investment News, there are 9 million homes in the United States that meet this standard.

The SEC’s new rule will require that private-placement issuers take reasonable and appropriate steps to assess an investor’s qualifications and ability to meet the accredited investor standard. According to the SEC, the broker may have to independently verify that the client meets the appropriate standards.

The new rule will give funds the ability to publicly solicit private investments. The SEC’s rule is an implementation of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act enacted by Congress in April 2012. Will the law help entrepreneurs raise capital or will investors lose another level of protection? Only time will tell.

Centaurus Financial, Inc Broker Ralph Saviano Barred From Securities Industry

September 15, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has barred Ralph Saviano (Saviano) from the securities industry after the broker failed to respond to FINRA’s requests for information and an interview concerning unreported tax liens, a civil judgment, and a customer complaint involving the misuse of funds.

During a routine investigation of Centaurus, FINRA discovered information regarding certain undisclosed liens, judgments, and possible customer loans. Thereafter, in June 2012, Centaurus filed a regulatory tip disclosing that a customer had provided Saviano with a cashier’s check for approximately $66,000 that was made payable to Saviano. Saviano’s transactions with the customer concerned a possible misuse or conversion of funds.

Saviano has been associated with several brokerage firms in the past decade. Until 2004 Saviano was a registered representative of Royal Alliance Associates, Inc. From April 2004 until December 2006, Saviano was associated with USAllianz Securities, Inc. Thereafter, from December 2006 until July 2007, Saviano was a registered representative of Questar Capital Corporation. Finally, Saviano was registered with Centaurus Financial, Inc. (Centaurus) until his termination in June 2012. According to Saviano’s FINRA disclosure records he is also the president of Saviano Financial Group.

SEC Issues Concerns Over Private Oil and Gas Offerings

September 7, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Private securities offerings of oil and gas ventures pose a substantial danger for investor fraud. According to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), there has been an increase in the number of civil fraud cases related to oil and gas private placements. Investing in private placement offerings carries unique risks and private oil and gas offerings have additional risks for investors to be aware of and to consider.

The SEC’s Investor Alert listed common red flag sales pitches that fraudulent oil and gas investments often make to investors including:

Sales pitches referring to high oil and gas prices;

ACGM, Inc. Settles Charges with FINRA Concerning Misleading Advertising

September 2, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

HKC Securities, Inc., known as ACGM, Inc. (ACGM), and Harold Kenneth Cohen (Cohen) of Palm Beach, Florida, reached a settlement the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over the firm’s use of certain hedge fund sales material that allegedly failed to fairly present the risks and potential disadvantages of hedge fund investing. According to FINRA, the sales materials violated FINRA Rule 2210(d) by only highlighting the hedge fund’s positive features, not providing a sound basis for evaluating the investment, containing exaggerated language, failing to identify the basis for factual statements made, and containing an inadequate discussion of the performance of the funds.

The settlement states that between January 2008 and June 2011, the firm marketed hedge funds to large institutional investors such as educational and other endowment funds. The regulator found that ACGM’s procedures for the review and approval of hedge fund institutional sales material were not reasonably designed or implemented to achieve compliance with FINRA’s content standards for institutional sales material and were not appropriate for a business actively engaged in the third-party marketing of hedge funds. Cohen was the firm’s Chief Compliance Officer and the principal responsible for the review and approval of institutional sales material. The complaint alleges that Cohen failed to adequately supervise the review of sales materials in order to achieve compliance with FINRA’s content standards.

The settlement provided some examples of the alleged misleading and exaggerated content provided to investors. One example referred to a fund as having “significantly outperformed its benchmarks” or a fund’s performance as “remarkable.” Another summary document referred to the performance of the underlying fund managers for a fund of funds over 1-year, 3-year, and 5- year time horizons, even though the fund of funds had only been in operation for approximately three months at the time of the document. Other documents failed to identify the basis for factual statements made and only described the fund as the “#l hedge fund in Israel” and describing another fund as the “#l performing equity market neutral fund in the world in 2005.”

John S. Turo Settles With Regulatory Agency Concerning Allegations of Selling Unregistered Securities

August 30, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

John S. Turo (a/k/a James S. Turo) recently reached a settlement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) concerning allegations that he sold unregistered, nonexempt securities through general solicitation of the public in violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 and in violation of NASD Rule 2110 and FINRA Rule 2010. The FINRA settlement result in a fine of $20,000. Turo became a registered securities representative and principal in 2003. From May 2005 until April 2007, Turo was associated with Innovation Capital, LLC. Starting in 2001, Turo was also associated with GT Securities, Inc. (GT Securities a/k/a Growthink Securities, Inc., Growthink, Inc., GTK Partners). Turo is the Managing Director and Chief Compliance Officer of GT Securities.

From 2008 and through 2010, Growthink issued securities to raise capital for GT Securities. In order to raise the capital, Turo sold private placements investments in Growthink to approximately 46 investors totaling $2,611,124. FINRA alleged that the private placement sales were nonexempt securities offerings that violated Rule 506 of Regulation D requiring registration and prohibits general solicitation of the investment to the public.

In order to sell the Growthink securities, FINRA alleges that Turo held webinars online on topics such as strategic business planning, entrepreneurship, and private equity investing that included general solicitations for investments in Growthink. The webinars were open to the general public. In addition, investors did not need a pre-existing relationship with Growthink or Turo in order to register and participate in the webinars. Thus, the webinars lacked a pre-screening process in order to limit the participants to only those who would qualify as accredited investors under the securities laws governing the sale of private placements. FINRA’s complaint alleged that the foregoing sales practices and the private placement offering itself violated various securities laws.

Gana LLP Investigating Claims Against Success Trade Securities for Sale of Promissory Notes

August 29, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has filed a complaint against Success Trade Securities, Inc (STS) and its CEO and President Fuad Ahmed (Ahmed) accusing them of improperly selling $18 million worth promissory notes. The promissory notes were issued by STS’ parent company Success Trade, Inc. (STI) to 58 investors. The notes were sold primarily to sports athletes in the NFL or NBA.

The FINRA complaint alleges that the STI notes were part of ponzi scheme to simply raise capital and fund STS’ operations while purportedly offering investors 12-26% returns. The investors were not aware of the risks of investing in the STI notes. For example, STS was at all times financially insolvent and could only meet its ongoing expenses by selling more STI notes and by continuing the scheme. Crucial risks such as the viability of the company are material risks that need to be disclosed to investors. The complaint also alleges that STS and Ahmed failed to register the STI notes as a private placement offering as required under Regulation D.

Problems with the notes began to emerge once the STI notes became due in 2012 through 2013. At that time, STS and Ahmed solicited noteholders to roll over or extend the terms of the STI notes at higher interest rates or offered customers an equity interest in STS. The complaint also alleges that in connection with the rollover and extended note sales the firm failed to disclose to some investors that the firm is financially unable to repay the notes that have become due.