Articles Posted in Investor Fraud

A “penny stock” is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a security issued by a very small company, micro-cap or less than $100 million in market capitalization, and trades at less than $5 per share.  Penny stocks generally are quoted over-the-counter, such as on the OTC Bulletin Board or OTC Link LLC.  However, not all penny stocks trade over-the-counter and many trade on securities exchanges, including foreign securities exchanges.  In addition, the definition of penny stock can also include private companies with no active trading market.

Penny stocks are inherently risky due to several contributing factors.  First, penny stocks may trade infrequently, meaning that it may become difficult to liquidate penny stock holdings once acquired.  Second, it may be difficult to find accurate quotes for certain penny stocks.  Therefore, it may be difficult or even impossible to accurately price certain penny stocks.  Due to these risks, penny stock investors may lose their whole investment.  When penny stock investing is combined with margin borrowing the results can be catastrophic for the investor.

If the inherent risks of penny stocks were not great enough, penny stocks are often used and manipulated for fraudulent purposes.  One common scheme is the “pump and dump” scheme. The idea behind a pump and dump scheme is to create unfounded hype for a penny stock the pumper already owns.  As the pumper’s victims buy into the hype additional purchases drive up the price of the stock artificially.  The pumper then sells his shares for a large profit while those the pumper recommended the penny stock to quickly lose their money as the stock’s value decreases precipitously.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has barred Todd Lloyd Goedeke and Ronald W. Nichter from the financial industry after the brokers were accused of misappropriating funds from customers.

In March 26, 2004, Goedeke became a registered representative with Cantella & Co., Inc. (Cantella), a FINRA regulated broker-dealer.  Goedeke remained associated with Cantella until his termination on June 18, 2010.  On or about July 1, 2010, Cantella filed a Form U5 that stated that Goedeke had been terminated.  On or about February 22, 2011 and March 16, 2011, Cantella filed amendments to their Form U5 disclosing allegations that Goedeke may have converted customer funds.  Goedeke’s public disclosures also list that he is employed by Wealthcare & Retirement Solutions, a financial planning company that provides insurance, fixed annuities, and life insurance.

Ronald W. Nichter became registered in the securities industry in December 2008 with Cantella Nichter’s registration was terminated by Cantella on April 4, 2013.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently entered a default decision against George Alexander Kardaras (Kardaras) and Brian Matt Borakowski (Borakowski) after having alleged that the two brokers perpetrated a Ponzi scheme.  FINRA found that the two solicited at least 12 customers over four years to invest more than $665,000 in total in Echo Canyon promissory notes.  The notes bore interest rates between 14 to 56 percent and had quarterly, semiannual, and annual maturity dates.

Kardas’ and Borakowski’s scheme involved soliciting customers to purchase promissory notes in Echo Canyon LLC, a limited liability company in Arizona.  Kardas and Borakowski told investors that their investment would be used to purchase used vehicles in U.S. auto auctions and shipped to Russia for re-sale.  FINRA determined that Kardaras and Borakowski never intended to use the customer funds as represented.  Instead, only two automobiles for EchoCanyon in or around late 2007 or early 2008 were actually purchased.

FINRA found that 95 percent of the funds raised, approximately $634,000 were used by the two brokers in order to pay personal expenses, to cover expenses at their employer firms’ branch office businesses, and to make payments to earlier investors in furtherance of the Ponzi scheme.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has filed a complaint against Success Trade Securities, Inc (STS) and its CEO and President Fuad Ahmed (Ahmed) accusing them of improperly selling $18 million worth promissory notes.  The promissory notes were issued by STS’ parent company Success Trade, Inc. (STI) to 58 investors.   The notes were sold primarily to sports athletes in the NFL or NBA.

The FINRA complaint alleges that the STI notes were part of ponzi scheme to simply raise capital and fund STS’ operations while purportedly offering investors 12-26% returns.  The investors were not aware of the risks of investing in the STI notes.  For example, STS was at all times financially insolvent and could only meet its ongoing expenses by selling more STI notes and by continuing the scheme.  Crucial risks such as the viability of the company are material risks that need to be disclosed to investors.  The complaint also alleges that STS and Ahmed failed to register the STI notes as a private placement offering as required under Regulation D.

Problems with the notes began to emerge once the STI notes became due in 2012 through 2013.  At that time, STS and Ahmed solicited noteholders to roll over or extend the terms of the STI notes at higher interest rates or offered customers an equity interest in STS.  The complaint also alleges that in connection with the rollover and extended note sales the firm failed to disclose to some investors that the firm is financially unable to repay the notes that have become due.

Former Merrill, Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch), Deutsche Bank Securities (Deutsche Bank), Inc., and Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. (Oppenheimer), broker Karl Edward Hahn (Hahn) was ordered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to pay former clients over $11 million for misconduct in April 2013.  Hahn was accused of common law fraud, negligent misrepresentations, and breach of fiduciary duties.

Hahn worked at Merrill Lynch from 2004 until 2008, at Deutsche Bank from 2008 to mid-2009, and at Oppenheimer from 2009 to early 2011.   Hahn allegedly recommended various unsuitable investments to customers including covered calls, a premium financed life insurance policy, and $2.3 million fraudulent real estate financing project “involving East Coast” properties.  Hahn allegedly recommended the life insurance policy for the the large commissions he stood to earn.  Hahn also allegedly pocketed the money that was supposedly going to finance the East Coast properties.

Other claims made against Hahn include churning of investment accounts.  Churning is a type of financial fraud where the broker engages in excessive trading in a client’s account for the purpose of generating commission but does not provide the investor with suitable investment strategy.

David Mickelson has been accused by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) of improperly selling approximately $8.3 million worth of various private placements to at least 71 customers without informing his brokerage firm (a practice known as “selling away“).

From 2004 through May 2011, Mickelson was associated with NFP Securities, Inc. (NFP).  Mickelson’s private placement sales during this time included investments in Micro Pipe Fund I, LLC (Micro Pipe Fund), The Nutmeg Fund/Michael Fund LLLP, The Nutmeg/Fortuna Fund, LP, the Nutmeg/Patriot Fund, LLLP, and Lone Wolf, Inc.  FINRA alleged that Mickelson created Micro Pipe Capital Management, LLC, Mickelson Investment Management, LLC, Hannahlu Ventures, LP, and DFM Agency, LLC in order to manage the various private placement offerings.

In order to promote his private placements, Mickelson allegedly marketed Micro Pipe Fund and other investments using misleading websites and advertisements communicated to customers using email accounts not monitored by NFP.  Mickelson’s websites included: mickelsoninvestmentmanagement.com/mickinvest.com; astuteasset.com; and mickelsonlife.com.  These websites contained securities-related communications including detailed discussions of private investment in public equity (PIPE) funds.

On March 6, 2013, Adorean Boleancu reached a settlement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) concerning allegations that he converted at least $650,000 from a customer.  By agreeing to the FINRA settlement Boleancu does not admit or deny any of the findings made against him but accepts a bar from associating with any broker dealer and to pay restitution in the amount of $650,000.

The complaint alleges that Boleancu converted at least $650,000 from an elderly widow while he was working at Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC (Wells Fargo).  Boleancu worked for Wells Fargo from February 1, 2008 until his termination on December 6, 2011.

Boleancu allegedly was able to convert the money from the investor by issuing checks in her name without her authorization and issuing those checks to others including his own girlfriend. The checks were drawn from the investor’s two home equity lines of credit that were opened shortly after Boleancu became her adviser.  In an attempt to keep his activities hidden, Boleancu allegedly made unauthorized payments through the investor’s checking account to pay interest accrued on the outstanding balances.  In the end it is estimated that Boleancu converted approximately $650,000.

Blake Richards (Richards), a former Georgia representative of LPL Financial (LPL), was charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with defrauding investors and misappropriating $2 million dollars from at least seven clients.  According to the complaint filed by the SEC in the Northern District Court of Georgia, Richards directed clients to write checks from retirement accounts or from life insurance policy proceeds in the name of investment businesses he owned, such as “Blake Richards Investments” and “BMO Investments.”  However, according to the SEC, his clients’ money was not used for legitimate investing purposes as Richards siphoned off millions for his own personal use.

Richards was a registered representative of LPL from 2009 through May 2013 out of his company, Lanier Wealth Management LLC.  According to the SEC’s complaint, Richards used a variety of devices to deceive investors and gain their trust.  For instance, Richards is alleged to have created fictitious statements on LPL letterhead in order to continue and conceal his scheme.  Richards also gave investors business cards with false professional designations, such as “AAMS”, standing for Accredited Asset Management Specialist, when Richards was not accredited.  Finally, Richards even delivered pain medication during a snowstorm to one client’s husband who had been diagnosed with terminal pancreatic cancer in order to gain the client’s trust.

The SEC complaint seeks an order to disgorge Richard’s ill-gotten gains and to free his assets pending further investigation.

On August 14, 2013, the Securities & Exchange Commission issued a press release explaining that it had charged two JPMorgan traders with attempting to conceal investor losses by overvaluing the investments in a portfolio that they managed.  The traders were Javier MarBecause of the overvalued investments, JPMorgan’s first quarter income before income tax expense was overstated by $660 million because of the alleged misconduct.

From the SEC:

The SEC alleges that Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout were required to mark the portfolio’s investments at fair value in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and JPMorgan’s internal accounting policy.  But when the portfolio began experiencing mounting losses in early 2012, Martin-Artajo and Grout schemed to deliberately mismark hundreds of positions by maximizing their value instead of marking them at the mid-market prices that would reveal the losses.  Their mismarking scheme caused JPMorgan’s reported first quarter income before income tax expense to be overstated by $660 million…

In 2010, College Health and Investment Ltd (College Health), a family limited partnership, filed a case against Wells Fargo & Co. (Wells Fargo) in Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) arbitration.  College Health accused Wells Fargo of failing to detect the theft and unauthorized transactions in College Health’s account.  College Health sought $4.4 million in damages against Wells Fargo.

From 2005 until 2008, Esther Spero (Spero), a former legal secretary at a firm that represented College Health, allegedly misused the family’s financial information and embezzled around $6 million.  Spero’s scheme worked by opening accounts in Wachovia (now Wells Fargo) under College Health’s name or similar names in order to appear related to College Health.  By doing so, she was easily able to transfer money from one of College Health’s actual accounts into the fake account and then finally into her own account.

College Health also filed a civil suit against Spero in the Southern District Court of Florida where she was eventually found guilty of the charges.  However, Spero was unable to pay College Health for the amount she had taken from the company leading College Health to bring action against Wells Fargo in FINRA arbitration.

Contact Information