Investor Fraud

New York State Fines AXA Equitable $20 Million Over Variable Annuity Products

April 23, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

Governor Andrew M. Cuomo announced on March 17, 2014, that AXA Equitable (AXA) agreed to a consent order to pay a $20 million fine to the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) for violations relating to certain variable annuity products. The DFS investigation uncovered that AXA made changes to certain variable annuity products that limited potential returns for existing customers without providing adequate notice to New York. New York stated that AXA’s omissions limited the DFS’ ability to protect consumer by requiring existing customers to affirmatively “opt in” to the altered product rather than remaining in that investment by default. According to New York, AXA’s actions affected tens of thousands of New Yorkers with variable annuity products at AXA.

A variable annuity is complex bundled financial and insurance product. A variable annuity is a contract with an insurance company where the insurer agrees to make periodic payments to you and the investor chooses the investments made in the annuity. The value of your variable annuity will vary depending on the performance of the investment options chosen. The investment options for a variable annuity are usually mutual funds.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released a publication entitled: Variable Annuities: What You Should Know. In the publication, the SEC encouraged investors considering a purchase of a variable annuity to “ask your insurance agent, broker, financial planner, or other financial professional lots of questions about whether a variable annuity is right for you.” Often times the benefits of variable annuities are outweighed by the other provisions including surrender charges, mortality and expense charges, management fees, and rider costs. Variable annuities are also high sales commission products for financial advisors and sometimes advisors push these products on persons who do not need them or cannot benefit from them. For example, since an IRA account is already tax deferred it makes little sense to use an IRA account to hold a variable annuity investment.

Gana LLP Investigates Alleged Fraudulent Activity Related to Credit Suisse’s TVIX Notes

February 21, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

Gana Weinstein LLP, a full-service nationally recognized securities litigation firm, is investigating Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC for underwriting and VLS Securities, LLC (VLS) for marketing the VelocityShares Daily 2x VIX Short Term Exchange Traded Notes (TVIX). According to TVIX’s offering documents and marketing materials, TVIX was linked to twice the daily performance of the S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index. The offering documents stated that TVIX was designed for investors who seek exposure to the applicable underlying index.

TVIX do not represent ownership in any basket of securities, instead TVIX acts as a debt instrument that is supposed to track an index and on which the issuer pays the note based on the terms of the offering documents. As a result, investors may receive a cash payment at maturity. TVIX began trading on November 30, 2013 at a $100 per share price. On February 21, 2012, Credit Suisse temporarily suspended the issuance of new shares of TVIX, due to internal limits reached on the size of TVIX, according to Credit Suisse.

On March 22, 2012, the TVIX shares decline in price by over 29% as rumors were circulating that Credit Suisse was considering whether to begin reissuing shares of TVIX. On March 23, 2012 after Credit Suisse announced that it would reopen issuance of TVIX, the shares dropped another 30% in value.

Investment Losses In Oppenheimer Global Resource Private Equity Fund

February 21, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The law firm of Gana Weinstein LLP is investigating the Oppenheimer Global Resource Private Equity Fund. In August 2013, the SEC began investigating the Oppenheimer Global Resource Private Equity Fund for misleading investors about the valuation and performance of the fund. According to the SEC, the fund manager, Brian Williamson was barred from the industry and fined $100,000 for overstating the value of the fund’s holdings by over 18%. Williamson is a resident of Newtown, Pennsylvania. Williamson was an Oppenheimer employee from 2005 through 2011. In March 2013, the SEC also charged two investment advisers with misleading investors about the valuation and performance of the fund. The SEC order found that the Oppenheimer employees made the following misrepresentations to its clients:

1. That the increase in the funds value was due to performance when in fact it was due to a new valuation method;

2. That a third-party valuation firm wrote up the valuation; and

Ex- Stratton Oakmont Broker Accused of Churning

January 27, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

Christopher Veale, a broker who worked at Stratton Oakmont Inc., was accused by Massachusetts securities regulators of excessive trading in the account of an 81-year-old person from 2010 to 2012.

The regulators said today in a statement that they’re seeking to bar Veale from the securities business in Massachusetts, along with his former colleague, Ali Habib Mayar, and their firm Brookville Capital Partners LLC, the brokerage where they worked at the time.

Martin Scorsese depicted Stratton Oakmont, Inc. in the film The Wolf of Wall Street. Prosecutors said that Stratton Oakmont generated millions of dollars in illicit profits by aggressively selling penny stocks and manipulating their prices from its offices in Lake Success, New York, before being shut down by regulators in 1996.

HFP Capital Markets’ Employees Sanctioned Over Metals Millings and Mining Private Placement Offering

December 18, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Advisor Thomas Mikolasko, (Mikolasko) of HFP Capital Markets LLC (HFP) was recently suspended and fined by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over allegations that Mikolasko engaged in the sale of $3 million in Senior Secured Zero Coupon Notes sold to 58 customers of HFP for Metals Millings and Mining LLC (MMM) in a private placement offering. The MMM Notes defaulted and investors were not repaid either principal or the 100 percent return promised. FINRA found that Mikolasko negligently caused material misrepresentations and omissions of material facts to be made in connection with the sale of MMM. FINRA also alleged that Mikolasko facilitated the offering even though he knew or should have known that HFP had conducted inadequate due diligence concerning the offering and that the limited due diligence the firm had conducted identified significant “red flags.”

Metals Millings and Mining LLC was an entity created in 2009 with HFP’s assistance. MMM was formed as a vehicle to aggregate and process certain ore materials. The investment’s sponsor had presented to HFP a plan to extract precious metals from the ore concentrate through a process known as “plasmafication.” HFP’s former chief executive, Vincent J. Puma was primary responsibility for HFP’s involvement in the MMM offering. From December 2009 to February 201l, HFP sold approximately $3 million of MMM Notes to 58 HFP customers. The MMM notes provided for the repayment of principal in one year together with the ownership of ore concentrate.

Pursuant to a repurchase agreement, MMM was then obligated repurchase the ore from the investors at an agreed price so that they would receive a 100 percent return on their investment in addition to the return of principal. There was no private placement memorandum for the transaction and investors were provided only with limited disclosures as forth in a subscription agreement. The MMM notes have defaulted and investors have not been repaid either principal or the promised 100 percent return.

Mark F. Spangler Convicted of Fraud and Money Laundering

November 20, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

A well-known investment adviser, Mark F. Spangler (“Spangler”), was convicted by a federal jury of 32 criminal counts of wire fraud, money laundering and investment advisor fraud. He defrauded friends and family by diverting their investments into two-risky startup companies. U.S. Attorney Mark Durkan stated, “This defendant used his position of trust as a tool to cheat his clients out of money for their mortgages, their children and grandchildren’s education, their retirement and plans for charitable giving.”

Spangler’s illicit activity was uncovered after a FBI raid of his house in September 2011. While investors faced insurmountable losses, Spangler used their money to investment in startup companies and to live a life of luxury. At trial the evidence and witness testimony established that Spangler repeatedly violated his fiduciary duty as an investment adviser by misleading investors about where their money was invested. Spangler supplied investors with false quarterly statements with inflated values for their accounts. He told clients that their assets were valued at $73 million; however the actual value recovered was approximately $28 million. By falsifying account statements to clients, investors suffered a substantial loss of $45 million.

In certain situations, when an investor requested to liquidate accounts, Spangler paid out these investors with capital raised by new investors. The Ponzi scheme began to unravel as the private fund was unable to satisfy redemption requests. Eventually, the Spangler Group filed for receivership proceedings. Receivership occurs when a company cannot meet its financial obligations or enters into bankruptcy. The filing for receivership in state court by the Spangler Group was a red flag for the SEC and the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

SEC Charges A Subsidiary of Royal Bank of Scotland with Misleading Investors in Subprime RMBS Offering

November 14, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

On November 7, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) today charged RBS Securities Inc., a subsidiary of the Royal Bank of Scotland plc, with misleading investors in a 2007 subprime residential mortgage-backed security (RMBS) offering. RBS agreed to settle the matter and pay more than $150 million, which the SEC will use to compensate investors for harm suffered as a result of RBS’s conduct.

According to the SEC, RBS told investors that the loans backing the offering “generally” met the lender’s underwriting guidelines even though more than 25% did not comport with the stated guidelines and should have been entirely excluded form the offering. RBS, then known as Greenwich Capital Markets, quickly reviewed a very small portion of the loans and was paid approximately $4.4 million for its work as the lead underwriter on the transaction, the SEC said in a complaint filed in federal court in Connecticut.

“In its rush to meet a deadline set by the seller of these loans, RBS cut corners and failed to complete adequate due diligence, with predictable results,” said George S. Canellos, co-director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “Today’s action punishes that misconduct and secures more than $150 million in relief for those harmed by this shoddy securitization.”

What are Tenants-in-Common Securities?

October 30, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Tenants-in-common real estate investments (“TIC”) are a more than $1-billion a year industry. However, with all innovative investment products, TIC investments receive their share of complaints from unhappy investors who bought them through a private placement. In FINRA arbitration, these complaints materialize as suitability claims and allegations of negligent misrepresentation. Usually, one or more of the following claims are made:

Investing in a TIC was not appropriate for me because of my needs, experience, or risk tolerance.
My broker did not perform adequate due diligence on the,offering materials of the TIC, appraisals of the underlying properties, persons promoting the TIC.

How To Guide: Tips on Avoiding Investment Scams

September 28, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

You read about investment scams, but you never think it can happen to someone like you.

We have all read about the Bernie Madoffs and Allen Stanfords of the world. Unsuspecting investors duped into some of the largest ponzi schemes in the world. You think to yourself that it can never happen to you or anyone you know – that you are too smart. You may be right, but a lot of victims are smart and sophisticated investors. The lure of safe investments with high returns is appealing to everyone. Don’t get caught chasing returns in investments you do not understand.

High Yield and No Risk

FINRA Publishes Fraud Susceptibility in the United States Study

September 25, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently released a report detailing the American public’s susceptibility to financial fraud. The Financial Fraud Research Center estimated that fraud costs the American people over $50 billion a year without including the cost of efforts to prevent and prosecute fraud.

The report entitled, Financial Fraud and Fraud Susceptibility in the United States made two summary claims. The first claim is that ever present fraud solicitations coupled with the inability of people to recognize the signs of fraud place a large number of Americans at risk, especially older Americans. Second, policy maker’s inability to obtain an accurate measure of financial fraud frustrates our understanding of its prevalence and our ability to prevent fraud.

The study highlighted that many Americans cannot identify classic “red flags” of fraud. For instance, the study cited that many Americans lack an understanding of what a reasonable rate of return on a investment would be. The study found that over 4 in 10 people participating in the study found promises of a annual return of 110% or a “fully guaranteed” investment appealing. Participants found such promises appealing even though returns of over 100% are highly improbable and virtually no investment is guaranteed. This lack of understanding leaves many Americans susceptible to fraudulent sales pitches. The study also found that older Americans, age 65 and older, are more likely to be targeted by fraudsters and 34% more likely to lose money than people in their forties.